+1 650 405 4067
Tag Archives: The Joint Commission
National Patient Safety Goals 2022 Best
This assignment increases the students’ awareness of the National Patient Safety Goals developed by The Joint Commission. Specifically, this assignment will introduce the Speak Up Initiatives, an award-winning patient safety program designed to help patients promote their own safety by proactively taking charge of their healthcare
National Patient Safety Goals
Purpose This assignment increases the students’ awareness of the National Patient Safety Goals developed by The Joint Commission. Specifically, this assignment will introduce the Speak Up Initiatives, an award-winning patient safety program designed to help patients promote their own safety by proactively taking charge of their healthcare. Course outcomes: This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes: CO #2: Apply the concepts of health promotion and illness prevention in the laboratory setting. (PO #2) CO #8: Explain the rationale for selected nursing interventions based upon current nursing literature.
National Patient Safety Goals
(PO #8) Due date: Your faculty member will inform you when this assignment is due. The Late Assignment Policy applies to this assignment. Total points possible: 50 points Preparing the assignment 1. Follow these guidelines when completing this assignment. Speak with your faculty member if you have questions. a. Select a Speak Up brochure from The Joint Commission website. b. Write a short paper reviewing the brochure. Use the Grading Criteria (below) to structure your critique. c. Include current nursing or healthcare journal article to support your critique. 2. Include the following sections.
National Patient Safety Goals
a. Introduction of brochure (3 points/6%) i. Includes brochure title ii. Identifies date published iii. Describes individuals or groups iv. Brochure properly cited, included on reference list, and submitted with assignment b. Summary of article (5 points/ 10%) -brochure citation required i. Explain the main topics discussed c. Communication (5 points/10 %) -brochure citation required i. Review information that promotes communication between patients and healthcare providers d. Personal Reflection (2 points /4%) i. Why did this topic interest you? e. Evaluation of brochure (14 points/28% total (2 points each) (Brochure & nursing article must be cited).
National Patient Safety Goals
i. Was the information provided in the brochure beneficial? Could you incorporate it in your patient education? ii. What was done well, and what could have been improved in the brochure? iii. Was the information presented clearly? iv. Did current nursing or healthcare related research article support the information presented in the brochure? v. What population or individuals does this article apply to (i.e., who will benefit the most from this brochure)? vi. Who else can use this information? vii. Will this information increase patient safety? f. Evidence Review & Application (5 points/10% total).
National Patient Safety Goals
i. Evidence was integrated from a recent (5 years) scholarly nursing journal article to support your answers. g. Conclusion (5 points/10%) i. Restates main ideas ii. Includes supporting information from body of paper. iii. Summarizes the benefits of following the brochure’s advice to a person at risk h. APA style and structure (2 points/4%) i. Adheres to current APA edition formatting guidelines for title page, margins, in-text citations, and references ii. Section headers are required a. Summary of Brochure b. Patient Communication c. Personal Reflection d. Evaluation of Brochure e. Evidence Review and Application.
National Patient Safety Goals
f. Conclusion iii. Paper is no longer than three (3) pages, excluding title page, reference page, and copy of brochure a. Extra pages will not be read or contribute to the assignment grade i. Clarity of writing (9 points/18%) i. Proper use of Standard English ii. Shows original thought iii. No spelling or grammar errors iv. Information presented in a logical progression For writing assistance (APA, formatting, or grammar) visit the Citing Library Sources page in the online library. Please note that your instructor may provide you with additional assessments in any form to determine that you fully understand the concepts learned in the review module. https://youtu.be/NrbEGtbQMVg
Attached Files
|
Different evaluation methods 2022 Best
For this assignment we will describe different evaluation methods for a healthcare quality improvement initiative, justify this method after its initial launch date, and discuss how evaluation methods for this initiative should change over time.
Different evaluation methods
Throughout this module, you have been learning about evaluation methods. In this assignment, you will describe different evaluation methods for a healthcare quality improvement initiative, justify this method after its initial launch date, and discuss how evaluation methods for this initiative should change over time. By successfully completing this assignment, you will gain the knowledge and skills required to complete a portion of your project due later in this course. For the purposes of this assignment, imagine that you are employed in the quality department of a hospital.
Different evaluation methods
Your hospital recently implemented an ongoing professional practice evaluation (OPPE) using criteria specific to The Joint Commission medical staff standard. The Joint Commission (E-dition) standard that is applied during the OPPE is: Introduction to Standard MS.08.01.03 Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation The ongoing professional practice evaluation allows the organization to identify professional practice trends that impact on quality of care and patient safety. Such identification may require intervention by the organized medical staff. The criteria used in the ongoing professional practice evaluation may include the following:
Different evaluation methods
Review of operative and other clinical procedure(s) performed and their outcomes Pattern of blood and pharmaceutical usage (obtain from laboratory and pharmacy directors, respectively) Requests for tests and procedures Length of stay patterns Morbidity and mortality data Practitioner’s use of consultants Other relevant criteria as determined by the organized medical staff The information used in the ongoing professional practice evaluation may be acquired through the following: Periodic chart review Direct observation Monitoring of diagnostic and treatment techniques Discussion with other individuals involved in the care of each patient.
Different evaluation methods
Including consulting physicians, assistants at surgery, and nursing and administrative personnel As a result of the OPPE process, it was found that two credentialed providers, two urology surgeons specifically, have been found to be deficient on the OPPE in the area of infections: both surgeons’ post-operative urosurgery patients have been experiencing antibiotic-resistant urinary tract infections. Not only does this impact the quality of the care per the standards, but it can also impact the social marketing of the hospital, increase the costs of care, increase patient length of stay, and decrease reimbursement.
Different evaluation methods
Therefore, your task is to recommend an evaluation method for 3, 6, and 12 months intended to evaluate the reduction in infection rates as part of a quality improvement initiative. Then, you will need to justify your evaluation method and why the method(s) should be employed after the initiative launch. Lastly, you will discuss how this evaluation method should change over time to accurately assess the initiative over time. As you complete this assignment, reflect on the following: How do you address the urinary tract infection rates in periods of 3, 6, and 12 months, and how will you lay out a plan for these urology surgeons?
Different evaluation methods
After all, the medical executive committee (MEC) of your hospital is held accountable to fulfill the OPPE requirements. If these two surgeons continue to have post-operative patients with infections, the MEC will determine what happens next. The MEC is committed to reducing patient harm and, specifically, they are committed to having an active OPPE process to drive quality improvements. Prompt Write a memo that is to be shared with the MEC. This memo will discuss the evaluation methods that could be employed to address the situation described in the scenario. Use at least two scholarly sources to support your claims. https://youtu.be/B9RgBpsgBkA
Different evaluation methods
Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria: Evaluation methods at 3, 6, and 12 months: Recommend evaluation methods for reducing infection rates as a quality improvement initiative at 3, 6, and 12 months. Justify an evaluation method: Justify an evaluation method for healthcare quality improvement initiative at 3, 6, and 12 months after initiative launch. Why evaluation methods change: Discusses how evaluation methods for healthcare quality improvement initiatives should change over time, depending on the change of infection rates over time.
Attached Files
|
