+1 650 405 4067
Tag Archives: Dialogue
American Literature Writing 2023 Best
American Literature Writing Assignment #1 Part I First, read the passages below from Herman Melville’s “Bartleby, The Scrivener”: Poor fellow! thought I, he means no mischief; it is plain he intends no insolence; his aspect sufficiently evinces that his eccentricities are involuntary.
American Literature Writing
American Literature Writing Assignment #1 Part I First, read the passages below from Herman Melville’s “Bartleby, The Scrivener”: Poor fellow! thought I, he means no mischief; it is plain he intends no insolence; his aspect sufficiently evinces that his eccentricities are involuntary. He is useful to me. I can get along with him. If I turn him away, the chances are he will fall in with some less indulgent employer, and then he will be rudely treated, and perhaps driven forth miserably to starve. Yes. Here I can cheaply purchase a delicious self-approval.
To befriend Bartleby; to humor him in his strange willfulness, will cost me little or nothing, while I lay up in my soul what will eventually prove a sweet morsel for my conscience. […]
American Literature Writing
Aside from higher considerations, charity often operates as a vastly wise and prudent principle — a great safeguard to its possessor. Men have committed murder for jealousy’s sake, and anger’s sake […]; but no man, that ever I heard of, ever committed a diabolical murder for sweet charity’s sake. Mere self-interest, then, if no better motive can be enlisted should […] prompt all beings to charity and philanthropy. In about 300 words, write about the significance of these passages. What do they tell us about the narrator — about his motives, desires and world-view? How might his logic be suspect here and there?
American Literature Writing
To make sure your interpretation is grounded in the text, quote a term or phrase from one of these passages in your explanation. Additionally, discuss briefly some other passage in the story, something that you think is relevant to your discussion, explaining why it’s relevant. Quote something from this “other” part of the story, even if it’s just a phrase. Your quotations can be longer than a term or phrase. But keep in mind that no quoted text counts toward your 300 words. Part 2 Imagine Bartleby working for a large corporation today. https://youtu.be/rVWd0niL418
American Literature Writing
Imagine that his supervisor has sent him to the Human Resources department to have a discussion with two HR officers there about his “preference” problem. These personnel specialists are trying to be as sympathetic as possible to Bartleby and are trying to work out a plan of action for his improvement and well-being. Write a short dialogue — as if it were a play, dialogue only — between Bartleby and these 2 Human Resources specialists of the present day.
American Literature Writing
Show how our 21st-century concerns and ideals might change the way these employees deal with Bartleby (as compared to the 19th-century narrator in the story). Write at least 400 words of this dialogue in a play format, like this: CARL: Welcome, Bartleby… BARTLEBY: […] JENNA: […] BARTLEBY: […] You can name the HR characters whatever you’d like. Keep in mind that the HR people might have to speak to each other as well as to Bartleby. Maybe they have different ideas about how to approach this problem… https://youtu.be/rVWd0niL418
Attached Files
|
Applied learning paper 2022 Best
The objective of the applied learning paper (ALP) is to take important concepts covered in the course and apply them in practical ways to further enhance learning. It specifically will focus on what you have learned about your interpersonal communication skills and relationship patterns and how these relate to the course content.
Applied learning paper
Paper details: The objective of the applied learning paper (ALP) is to take important concepts covered in the course and apply them in practical ways to further enhance learning. It specifically will focus on what you have learned about your interpersonal communication skills and relationship patterns and how these relate to the course content. The following four issues must be addressed in your paper: 1. Describe in detail the most important interpersonal communication insight that you’ve had about yourself during this course.
Applied learning paper
This should be interpersonal in nature, or how you communicate to and with others. Your response should include the following: • Tell what the specific insight is • Explain why you consider this the most important insight you’ve had recently • Discuss how you have come to this realization (show relevance to course content: reading, in-class exercises, role-plays, etc.) • Explain how this interpersonal communication insight benefits or hinders you personally and professionally.
Applied learning paper
Discuss how you intend to continue building upon your learning in this area (include a concrete, measurable plan of action for the next three months) 2. Written dialogue of interpersonal skills Create a brief written dialogue between yourself and another person that effectively uses the three verbal active listening skills covered in this course: paraphrasing, empathy, and self-disclosure. The dialogue should be written out in a way that emphasizes the proper use of each active listening skill.
Applied learning paper
There needs to be at least one clear example of each skill (properly labeled in parentheses) in the dialogue. Here’s a brief example of how it could begin and shows the first skill: Scene: (Provide a brief descriiption of the scene) Tom and I are co-workers having lunch at our desks. Tom: Man, it’s been a rough day so far. Bob: Really, what’s been tough about it? Tom: I met with our manager early this morning for my review and he came down really hard on me for missing the sales quota the past two months.
He says if I don’t improve my numbers by the end of the quarter, he will have to let me go. I can’t afford to be without a job.
Applied learning paper
My wife was just diagnosed with cancer, I need a new roof on my house and my dad just broke his hip. Bob: I think you’re saying that with all these other pressures in your personal life, it’s going to be very difficult for you to increase your work output in order to save your job and pay for these major expenses. Is that what you mean? (Paraphrasing) You then continue with the dialogue showing and labeling the other skills. The dialogue need not be lengthy (about 3 pages double-spaced is usually adequate). The emphasis here is on accurately using each of the skills as discussed in class. 28 Revised 8.2.21, 09/12/2022 3.
Applied learning paper
Cultural biases • Describe in detail at least one cultural bias you are aware of and who it involves • How does this bias create difficulty or limit you in your ability to fully accept and communicate with people in this cultural or ethnic group? What do you believe is the origin of this bias? • What could you do to begin working through this bias in the near future (concrete action points). 4. Conflict management. • Describe in detail one area where you have difficulty managing conflict with others • Briefly explain a sample situation of how this conflict looks and your typical response.
How would you like to respond differently? • What practical steps could you apply from the content of this course to improve your conflict management? https://youtu.be/XiURBssx0Iw
Attached Files
|
comparative Analysis of Rachel by Angelina 2022 Best
This is a comparative Analysis of Rachel by Angelina Grimke and “Sisters Matsumoto” by Philip Gotanda. So, for this paper we will analyze similarities and differences in how authors reveal their themes (via dramatic structure and literary elements).
Comparative Analysis of Rachel by Angelina
Paper details: Plays: “Rachel” by Angelina Grimke and “Sisters Matsumoto” by Philip Gotanda . Theme: historical trauma as it relates to racially marginalized communities. Analyze similarities and differences in how your authors reveal their themes (via dramatic structure and literary elements). Both formal and stylistic elements–such as genre, tone, imagery, figurative language, symbolism, characterization, setting, dialogue, diction, etc.–may help prove your argument, but you should focus on as few devices as possible, seeking depth of analysis rather than breadth.
Comparative Analysis of Rachel by Angelina
If your authors share devices, your comparison becomes direct and pointed. Seek out similarities/differences in dramatic and literary technique just as eagerly as you found commonalities in theme. A comparative summary would focus on “what” the authors say. Your comparative analysis will discuss “how” the authors speak to us. An ideal essay will focus on a single theme and a single literary-dramatic device across two plays, taking a “deep dive” that considers both similarities and differences in order to arrive at a larger claim for significance about how this comparison reveals something new, interesting, or telling to the essay’s reader.
Comparative Analysis of Rachel by Angelina
Finally, construct an argument that compares and contrasts your authors’ approaches to a shared theme. This argument should not be obvious. It should require evidence from the texts to prove, and it should require your voice to elucidate. Your essay should not conclude without 1) anticipating and preempting objection from your audience and 2) establishing significance for your audience. Why does this argument matter? What’s at stake?
Comparative Analysis of Rachel by Angelina
Try to transcend the simple act of answering a prompt in a writing course and say something meaningful for your readers–connecting literary devices and themes to playwriting generally, to readers’ lives, or to the broader human experience/society. Use quotations from texts as evidence to support argument. Introduction, 3-4 body paragraphs, and conclusion are required. https://youtu.be/AvDEH1EdyCg
Attached Files
|
Identifying fallacies 2022 Best
This assignment involves identifying fallacies, conclusions, and premises as well as correcting fallacies. Using the Unit V Assignment Template , review the dialogue (short conversation) between three people.
Identifying fallacies
Your assignment for this unit involves identifying fallacies, conclusions, and premises as well as correcting fallacies. Using the Unit V Assignment Template , review the dialogue (short conversation) between three people. Identify four fallacies, along with the four premises and conclusions leading up to the fallacies identified. In the first column, identify the fallacy present. In the second column, identify the conclusion of the fallacious argument, and in the third column identify the premises, or the reasons offered for the conclusion.
Identifying fallacies
In the last column, propose some ways to counter this fallacy. You should have a total of four fallacies, four conclusions, four premises, and four counters to correct the fallacies. You can list the four fallacies as: -Material fallacies -Fallacies of relevance (red herrings) -Affirming the consequent -Denying the antecedent View the Unit V Sample Dialogue and Template for an example of how your completed assignment should look. APA Style will not be required for this assignment, and no outside resources are required. https://youtu.be/4CtofTCXcYI
Attached Files
|
