+1 650 405 4067
Tag Archives: dissertation
Research in Educational Leadership. 2023 Best
This assignment entails writing a scholarly essay of engaging with Research in Educational Leadership.
Research in Educational Leadership.
Assignment (100%): a 4000-word scholarly, critical analysis and reflection as follows: Part 1: Literature Review A critical literature review in relation to an aspect of educational leadership. As well as providing a substantive review of the literature it should include an explanation of how sources were chosen and why: for example, what parameters were set; what search terms used and why. Critical reflections on lessons learnt about carrying out a literature review should be included within the assignment. Choose a topic, ideally one which might be of interest for your dissertation.
Research in Educational Leadership.
Write a thematic literature review on this topic. You should: Compare and contrast the findings about this topic from previous research (i.e.do NOT just summarize the publications). Critically evaluate the body of research throughout your comparison. Come to a conclusion about the strengths and weaknesses of current research on the topic. Outline if there are any research gaps on this topic (i.e. areas that have been under-researched and are in need of more attention in future research). Important note: You will NOT be able to use this assignment directly as a chapter in your dissertation.
Research in Educational Leadership.
Therefore, choose a topic that is related to your dissertation interests or broader than your particular dissertation idea, so that you can still use the information you learn (but not the exact words you write). Your literature review should deal with the character and nature of the work you are reviewing. If it is a research focused source then you need to provide details of how the data was collected and analysed, so some information with regard to methodology. If it is a theoretical source, you should identify this and provide an insights as to how the theory was generated, or what theory was applied.
Research in Educational Leadership.
Ultimately, this is in order for you to be able to give an authoritative view on how reliable, and relevant the research is to your review, your narrative and your argument. Page | 2 If you do not engage with the character of the literature in this way, then you will not be addressing the learning outcomes as developed, throughout this Unit ‘Engaging with Research in Educational Leadership’. For example, do not write a descriptive and discursive ‘essay’ which involves the literature to back up the points you are making, instead of getting into the details of the research.
Research in Educational Leadership.
Requirements: A clear topic in the form of a title or question which is related to the field of education Minimum 10-12 academic sources (you can use more) Only academic sources used (books, journal articles, reliable research reports) Most sources should be research-based This assignment is worth 75% of your overall module mark. Word count: 3,000 words (+/- 10%). Part 2: Critical Reflection A reflective account of your learning on the course unit and the influence this had had on your professional practice. You should show how your thinking has developed since the beginning of the course.
Research in Educational Leadership.
For those who can, you may draw on the discussions you had during the opening conference. Alternatively, you can refer to your first postings and portfolio contributions from the early themes or unit one. This is intended to show the ‘baseline’ understanding they established to think about how your knowledge is developing as a result of this course unit and how this has, or can influence your professional practice. Word count: 1,000 words (+/- 10%). Please note there is the opportunity to submit a draft reflection for your tutor to give feedback on. Submit your draft by the beginning of Week 8 (please see Key Dates for exact deadline), via your PebblePad portfolio.
Research in Educational Leadership.
Page | 3 Suggested structure Part 1: Literature Review Introduction: explain the topic and context, why the topic is important (using evidence!), and give any necessary definitions (250-300 words) Approach: explain how you found your sources, what databases you used, what keywords you used, and what selection or exclusion criteria you applied and why (200-300 words) Main body: organize your paragraphs according to themes or issues which appear in the research. Choose themes that appear in several sources to let you compare. Critically evaluate throughout. You could divide this into 2-3 sections with subheadings. (1800-2100 words)
Research in Educational Leadership.
Conclusion: reach an overall evaluation of what is known, the strengths and weaknesses of current research in the area, and what research gap(s) exist (i.e. what future research still needs to find out) (250-300 words) Part 2: The Critical Reflection The critical literature review requires some preparation and guidance. It will encompass 25% of the marks, so you should apportion 1000 words +/- 10%. to this task. For this reflective account you should use Gibbs (1988) reflective cycle. https://youtu.be/9ekcWQxgk3k
Attached Files
|
Fine Particle pollution 2022 Best
This paper explores whether fine Particle pollution negatively affect lung growth in children. Paper details: The project dissertation should demonstrate the ability to critically research, appraise, evaluate and solve a specific problem in your chosen research area.
Fine Particle pollution
(META-ANALYSIS) Does fine Particle pollution negatively affect lung growth in children? Paper details: The project dissertation should demonstrate the ability to critically research, appraise, evaluate and solve a specific problem in your chosen research area. The project dissertation should be concise. It should (excluding ancillary data such as the abstract, captions, appendices and references) not exceed 8,500 words. Dissertations must be typed on one side of A4 paper with margins of at least 1.5 cm and with 1.5 or double spaced text. Your eVision cover sheet should be included immediately inside the front cover. Reports are part of the examination of the student and, on submission, become University property.
Fine Particle pollution
Your supervisor will guide you on the format of the dissertation, briefly outlined below. Title should be specific, brief and followed by the author’s name, year, and the words “B.Sc. (Hons.), [title of Honours degree], Anglia Ruskin University”. Abstract – This is a concisely worded synopsis of the research detailing the background, aim, methodology, results and main conclusions from the body of work. It should be complete without reference to the rest of the report, is usually be written only when the rest of the report is complete, and should not contain afterthoughts or statements that are not evident in the rest of the report.
Fine Particle pollution
As a guide you should expect to write your abstract in 200-250 (max) words. Acknowledgements should include details of any assistance or advice given at any stage during the course of the project by the supervisor, other members of academic staff, technical staff, etc. Table of Contents should give the relevant page numbers and be set out so as to give a good guide to the structure and contents of the report. You may also decide to include a List of Figures and Tables, with titles and page numbers, although there is no strict requirement for this. A List of Abbreviations can also be useful if lost of terms are abbreviated in the dissertation.
Fine Particle pollution
Introduction – This represent a significant body of reading and writing. The Introduction provides the background to the study, the current state of research in your chosen field and identify the research gaps that lead to your aims. Provide references to previous research of a general nature (these will be discussed more fully in the discussion where they are of direct relevance to the project) Aims and Objectives – The overarching aim of your dissertation is included at the end of your Introduction, and identifies the questions your research aims to answer. You will find writing a well worded measurable aim an art form, your supervisor will be able to help develop your aims.
Fine Particle pollution
As a guide you should expect to write between 3000-4000 words for the Introduction, including aims. Material and Methods – The methods section is where you define the methods employed to answer your research question. It should contain any of the following: area of fieldwork, details of apparatus and methods, description of materials, software etc. (see supervisor for precise advice). For laboratory based projects this includes the reagents used, including the manufacturer, if you have used DNA primers this includes the sequences. For Meta-Analysis projects you would ordinarily include details about the search criteria, databases, inclusion/exclusion criteria.
Fine Particle pollution
It should provide sufficient information for the reader to follow, and if necessary, repeat any procedure, and list the equipment used, detail any modifications to established techniques and describe/ illustrate all specially constructed equipment and novel procedures. You should describe all experimental conditions, procedures and precautions necessary to ensure accuracy and safety, and (if necessary) refer to preliminary experiments and to consequent changes in techniques. Also you need to include statistical methods employed in your research. As a guide you should expect to write between 1000-1500 words. https://youtu.be/qWR_V3f02K8
Attached Files
|
The city of Houston Texas 2022 Best
For this assignment we will focus on the city of Houston Texas and analyze the education systems budget and make suggestions about what they should change and what is working.
The city of Houston Texas
Paper details Use the city of Houston Texas. Analyze the education systems budget and make suggestions about what they should change and what is working. The paper is expected to be a journal-style paper. The topic should be one that is potentially publishable with work beyond the class requirements. The main restriction on the topic is that you must analyze budgeting issues on a local, state or federal level. A term paper topic that is related to the student’s dissertation topic is an excellent choice.
The city of Houston Texas
The paper should follow Journal of public budgeting, accounting & financial management style guidelines and be about 12- 20 pages in length (exceptions to this will be granted upon request). The length limit is only a guide. The paper should be whatever length is appropriate for the topic. The alternative projects can be negotiated on an individual basis. Any late paper will be assessed a 10-point late penalty. The instructor reserves the right to require any student to rewrite their term paper. In this event, the student‘s final grade on the paper will be the average of the original grade and the grade on the revised version. https://youtu.be/nBH6FwbOgPs
Attached Files
|
