+1 650 405 4067
Tag Archives: Narrative
Synthesis Paper-Doctoral Identity. 2023 Best
Synthesis Paper-Doctoral Identity. In Topic 2, you were asked to read three articles on the topic of doctoral identity and to complete an annotated bibliography to demonstrate their understanding of the material.
Synthesis Paper-Doctoral Identity.
Synthesis Paper on Doctoral Identity.. In Topic 2, you were asked to read three articles on the topic of doctoral identity and to complete an annotated bibliography to demonstrate their understanding of the material. In Topic 3, you were asked to take this process a step further and identify themes found in the three articles and to complete a synthesis worksheet where the themes were supported by evidence from each article. In this assignment, you will build on your worksheet efforts and write a paper about the three themes. The narrative will not only present the evidence from the articles to support the identified themes, but also will provide an analysis for each theme by synthesizing the information collected.
Synthesis Paper-Doctoral Identity.
General Requirements: Locate the Synthesis Worksheet you completed in Topic 3. Locate and download “Synthesis Paper Template” from the Topic Resources. Review the articles by Baker & Pifer (2011), Gardner (2009), and Smith & Hatmaker (2014) located in the Topic Resources. This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. Review the GCU APA Style Guide for Writing located in the Student Success Center.
Synthesis Paper-Doctoral Identity.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance. Directions: Using the Synthesis Worksheet you completed in Topic 3 and considering the themes you developed and the feedback provided by your instructor, write a paper (1,000-1,250 words) that synthesizes the three articles. Your paper should include the following: An introduction that introduces and provides context for the topic.
Synthesis Paper-Doctoral Identity.
This includes giving a brief description of each article and its purpose, identifying the three themes that emerged from your reading, describing how they will be discussed in the paper, and presenting a clear thesis statement. Support for your identified themes with evidence from each article. Provide analysis of these findings to strengthen your narrative. A discussion of the conclusions that can be drawn when the articles are taken together as a single entity. What is the overall message of the group of articles? https://youtu.be/Pzfd6el3YNc
Attached Files
|
Review and reflection. 2022 Best
This assignment involves writing a review and reflection. Overview Do a fairly quick review of the main topics of the class and the core content from the readings. Then, answer the following. Use APA headings and in-text citations using the class content as support.
Review and reflection.
Paper details: Overview Do a fairly quick review of the main topics of the class and the core content from the readings. Then, answer the following. Use APA headings and in-text citations using the class content as support. Instructions: 1. If you were developing your own philosophy of teaching/learning, what did you learn from the class readings that would most inform your philosophy? Incorporate elements of higher-order thought in your response, which should be at a doctoral level depth of reflection. Elaborate on 7-10 specific concepts. Why did you choose those concepts?
Review and reflection.
2. What changes will you make in your own learning endeavors based on what you learned in class? Again, draw broadly from the class sources in a way that indicates a solid understanding of class content. 3. What questions or issues were raised in your mind related to adult learning theory, active learning approaches, or higher order. For the thread, support the assertion with broad references to the class sources in APA format. Draw from the sources broadly and cite per APA. At least 750 words not including references. The narrative should include numerous references to the class content. https://youtu.be/EuOhN5HmajM
Attached Files
|
PR Personal Values. 2022 Best
This paper explores PR Personal Values. The purpose of this assignment is to help students document/reflect on what they’ve learned and apply these lessons to current and/or future dilemmas they expect to experience.
PR Personal Values.
The purpose of this assignment is to help students document/reflect on what they’ve learned and apply these lessons to current and/or future dilemmas they expect to experience. I am providing some reflection questions for you to answer.* Below are some specific instructions and questions to guide your reflection. Your submission must address ALL the questions below in a coherent narrative: 1. What are the major sources of influence on your moral values as an individual (individuals, groups you belong to, situations you experienced, etc.)? To what extent have these sources of influence shaped your values and how?
PR Personal Values.
Reflecting on your development, discuss some ways in which your sense of ethical behavior has evolved over time. Provide specific instances where possible. 2. As a PR/AD practitioner, what is your responsibility to society? Note, I’m not only asking about responsibility to your clients or to consumers but to the larger communities that can be impacted, directly or indirectly by your work? Consider the necessity of ethical/responsible advocacy. 3. What are some Public Relations tools (concepts, examples, principles or theories, whatever you like) that you think you will be able to use in your career? 4. Discuss where you see yourself professionally in the next 2 – 5 years.
PR Personal Values.
What are some ethical dilemmas you think you are likely to face as a professional in this context (provide at least 3 potential ethical dilemmas)? Provide details and/or reasons why you think they constitute dilemmas and how you would address them. What are some ethical theories/frameworks that would guide your decision making in said situation? 5. What are some specific steps or actions you can take going forward to help you act ethically, both as an individual, and as a PR/AD professional (Ensure your response is both realistic and practical). How confident are you that in the future you will be able to practice PR/AD ethically and stick to your values? Why do you feel this way? https://youtu.be/Zgb_9I0YWeQ
Attached Files
|
Frankenstein Parody. 2022 Best
This paper explores Frankenstein Parody. Close Reading Criteria: Use these to think about your reading. • point of entry in story, i.e. where does it begin, how this influences the writing; importance of first line: • • structure – how is the story put together: diaphanous or solidly constructed?
Frankenstein Parody.
This will be a parody of the novels/authors (Frankenstein by Mary Shelley) based on a close reading of the text. The parody should show an ear for and an understanding of the author’s voice, tone, style, stance, or motifs, etc. Close Reading Criteria: Use these to think about your reading. • point of entry in story, i.e. where does it begin, how this influences the writing; importance of first line: • • structure – how is the story put together: diaphanous or solidly constructed? How much exposition (background info) does the story feature? Locate the story’s complication(s) and crisis—does it arrive early in the story or late.
Frankenstein Parody.
How and where do these begin building toward the climax, and when does it drop off into the resolution? • how does the author indicate that time is passing in the story? How much time does the story span? • how is character presented • what is the universe of the story/book? • what kind of sentences does author write, i.e. rhythm, the way they are strung together, connectors. What is good about the story/book? Where does it fail? • texture of work, how created, what is meant by texture?
Frankenstein Parody.
Think of burlap vs silk: burlap has huge holes compared to silk. Does the story leave out details, gaps for the reader to fill in? That makes it a burlap texture. Silk is fine: all the details and info are filled in for you. Victorian literature tends toward silk, modern lit toward burlap. Writer’s disposition to scene and narrative – how much given in scene, how much is expository • names of story – ordinary names are not notable, but functional, meaningful names indicate a kind of parable like meaning and determines the distance of characters from the reader.
Frankenstein Parody.
Narrative distance: Does the narratorial voice feel intimate or distant/cold? • leitmotifs – colors and images (or even repeated words) returned to again and again usually highlight something significant in the story • does work recall other readings? • use biographical details only as supplement, not as substitute for reading text.https://youtu.be/MRmahEYdWWg
Attached Files
|
