Tag Archives: pathos.

Emotional Intelligence 2023

Emotional Intelligence

PART 1: Emotional Intelligence: Your page will have these three subheadings written in bold font: Definition, Constructs and Importance. Under the Definition subheading you will be providing a definition of Emotional Intelligence.

Emotional Intelligence

PART 1: Emotional Intelligence: Your page will have these three subheadings written in bold font: Definition, Constructs and Importance. Under the Definition subheading you will be providing a definition of Emotional Intelligence. Under the Constructs subheading you will identify the four constructs of the Intelligence Model. Under the Importance subheading you will list each construct one by one and explain why you feel that construct is important and provide one example of how it could benefit a healthcare leader. Part 2: Write a short paragraph addressing one argument that supports your stance on a controversial issue (e.g., should the drinking age be increased; should we arm teachers; etc.).

Emotional Intelligence

Use ONE of the rhetorical appeals, Logos, Pathos, or Ethos, to make this argument. Do not tell us in your post which appeal you are using. Part 3: Return to this discussion and reply to one classmate’s post, telling us which rhetorical appeal is used in their post and why you believe this. Support your answer with specific examples from their post. Only reply to someone who does not already have a reply (unless there is a shortage of posts and all have replies). Your reply should be a short paragraph, at least 3 well thought out and well crafted sentences. https://youtu.be/loVRzxu-Oho

Attached Files

 |

Managing Intersectional Invisibility 2022 Best

Managing Intersectional Invisibility

This is a rhetorical analysis on “Managing Intersectional Invisibility and Hypervisibility During the Transition to College Among First-Generation Women of Color”.

Managing Intersectional Invisibility

Rhetorical Analysis Paper English 1001 – Spear Assignment Objectives: 1. Perform a thorough rhetorical analysis of a scholarly, peer-reviewed article on a topic of your choosing 2. Identify how the article fits into the rhetorical situation 3. Identify the rhetorical appeals used by the author of the article 4. Use direct quotations from your source article (at least three) 5. Correctly paraphrased material from your source article (at least one) Requirements: 1. Word document file, typed, double-spaced, TimesNewRoman 12pt font 2. 1000 words

Managing Intersectional Invisibility

3. Correct citation of source article 4. MLA style in-text citation 5. The article you choose to analyze needs to be peer-reviewed, published in a journal between 2015-2022, be 8-20 pages long, and found through LSU libraries. Steps and Pre-Writing Questions: 1. Carefully choose a topic and then an article with which you will become intimately familiar. The article you use must be peer reviewed and from a scholarly source. As a class we will have an in-class topic selection day (Monday, September 26). 2. Read your article closely several times through and make some decisions about how it fits into the rhetorical situation.

Managing Intersectional Invisibility

Who is the author? (That should be easy.) Who is the intended audience of the article? Why did the author choose to use an academic article to present his or her findings? Why did he or she publish in the journal in which the article now appears? 3. Analyze how the rhetorical appeals are being used. Which appeal or appeals are used most prominently? Where do the article and author draw their credibility? (Ethos) How does the article appeal to the values and beliefs of its audience? (Pathos) How does it use logic, data, and sound reasoning? (Logos) Good papers will assess how effectively or ineffectively an article uses each of the appeals.

Managing Intersectional Invisibility

You will be finding quotations and paraphrasing from your source article in order to support your findings. Your paper needs to have at least three quotations and one paraphrase. 4. After analyzing the article, go back and draw up a thesis based on your findings. We will have a workshop day for this and I discourage you from giving too much thought to thesis statements until you have finished your analysis. 5. Add a well-constructed introduction and conclusion which introduces your reader to the article you have analyzed and remind your reader of what you have found respectively. You will be graded on following the assignment requirements, the depth of your analysis, and organization. https://youtu.be/mrTdPjFhMZM

Attached Files

 |

Rhetorical analysis 2022 Best

Rhetorical analysis

For this assignment, you will choose one of the following articles and write a rhetorical analysis of it (we will be reading and discussing these texts in Week 3): “Defining the Relationship” by Rob Jenkins, Everything’s an Argument pp. 220-223 “The Toxicity in Learning” by Jenny Kim, Everything’s an Argument pp. 247-251 “Message to My Freshman Students” by Keith Parsons

Rhetorical analysis

RATIONALE In this age of social media, we are constantly bombarded with information: advertising, political messages, news reports, disinformation campaigns, conspiracy theories, and endless, endless memes. Being able to analyze these messages is an important skill to have, not only as a college student but as a professional in your field and as a citizen of the world. At every turn, we encounter a host of different perspectives and experiences that attempt to persuade us—and such attempts are not always ethical, honest, or made in good faith.

Rhetorical analysis

Understanding the rhetorical tools used to communicate (or potentially manipulate or outright deceive) not only helps you better understand the messages others attempt to convey, but it also helps you more effectively express your own intentions and ideas. Being aware of the rhetorical situation of any given argument will help you become a more effective, sophisticated, and ethical communicator/writer, which is essential to ensuring your success in the roles you will play before and after you graduate.

Rhetorical analysis

YOUR TASK For this assignment, you will choose one of the following articles and write a rhetorical analysis of it (we will be reading and discussing these texts in Week 3): “Defining the Relationship” by Rob Jenkins, Everything’s an Argument pp. 220-223 “The Toxicity in Learning” by Jenny Kim, Everything’s an Argument pp. 247-251 “Message to My Freshman Students” by Keith Parsons.  You must summarize the article in the second paragraph of your essay. Then, drawing on rhetorical concepts discussed in your textbook and in our class, compose an analysis that examines the text’s use of appeals in light of the text’s rhetorical situation.

Rhetorical analysis

In order to conduct your analysis, consider the following questions: ➢ What values, assumptions, and beliefs must one possess in order for the argument to be persuasive? ➢ In what larger social or cultural conversations does the text participate? ➢ How is the argument structured? What proof is provided to back up claims? ➢ What stylistic choices are significant to the (in)effectiveness of the argument? ➢ How does the author utilize the rhetorical appeals of ethos, pathos, and logos? Be sure to include the vocabulary we learn in class in your paper: rhetorical situation, purpose, audience, context, rhetorical appeals (ethos, pathos, logos), etc.

Rhetorical analysis

Your analysis should demonstrate your understanding of these concepts and your ability to apply them appropriately. FORMATTING Required page length: minimum of 750 – 1,000 words (2 ½ – 3 pages) Times New Roman size 12 font Double-spaced with one-inch margins all around Your essay must have an original title The first page of your paper should look like this example of a document formatted in MLA style. https://youtu.be/LJU9LsyBGsU

Attached Files

 |

Evaluation of a Website. 222 Best

Evaluation of a Website.

This assignment entails carrying out an evaluation of a Website. For your first major assignment, you’ll select a select a website for a product, service, or organization connected to your field, your projected profession or your personal interests and write a thesis-driven evaluative argument in which you examine the rhetorical strategies of the site.

Evaluation of a Website.

Major Assignment #1: Evaluation of a Website. For your first major assignment, you’ll select a select a website for a product, service, or organization connected to your field, your projected profession or your personal interests and write a thesis-driven evaluative argument in which you examine the rhetorical strategies of the site. For example, if you’re a pre-pharmacy or pre-med major, you might select a website for a medication like Zoloft (www.zoloft.com/), a medical school like or a fill-by-mail prescription service like Express Scripts (www.express-scripts.com/). If you’re a travel buff, you might choose a budget vacation finder like Travel Zoo (www.travelzoo.com/), a new fancy suitcase’s site (www.awaytravel.com).

Evaluation of a Website.

If you love Houston and never want to leave, consider the online presence of a Texas-based glossy magazine like Texas Monthly (www.texasmonthly.com/), a local coffee roastery (https://xelaroasters.com/) or a brewery (www.saintarnold.com/). If you dream of one day being a famous chef, you might choose a celebrity chef like Guy Fieri’s website (www.guyfieri.com/), a cookware company’s site (www.lecreuset.com/) or a site that aims to sell people pre-portioned cook-at-home meal kits (www.hellofresh.com). Each of these websites is making an argument: “(You should) buy this” or “(You should) trust us” or “(You should) join us.”

Evaluation of a Website.

The purpose of this essay is to evaluate how effectively your site persuades viewers to “do this” or “do that” by analyzing and evaluating the rhetorical elements in the site. The paper must be 3 to 5 pages, double-spaced, font size 12, standard 1” margins and follow MLA format conventions. You must include the url of the website used. Use the strategies for evaluation outlined in RRW, Ch. 8, Seyler’s discussion of rhetorical strategies in Ch. 3 and guidelines for reading photographs and advertisements in Ch. 5 to guide your thinking.

A successful essay will: • Bring readers into the context of the website, briefly summarize the website’s content, and make a claim (thesis) for the site’s rhetorical effectiveness or for the most significant rhetorical features of the site.

Evaluation of a Website.

A strong claim is both contestable – reasonable people might disagree – and predictive – it will set up expectations for the direction of your essay. • Develop your main points around specific criteria for evaluating the site. Consider how the site makes its argument, not whether or not you agree with the content. Analysis and evaluation rely on your objective judgments. Remember also that rhetoric encompasses any tools available for persuasion. Talk about the argument in terms of ethos, logos, pathos. Remember to state the criteria you’re using to evaluate the site. Observe and analyze the impact of the design and images used. Consider who might be the target audience.

Evaluation of a Website.

Support your main points with concrete examples (evidence) from the website. To develop and support your own points, you will need to include visual features and details (color, design, and images) as well as short quotations from the site. You must include 2+ images and 2+ quotes pulled from your site to illustrate and support your argument. Think of your own ethos and logos as you develop your argument and design your final document. https://youtu.be/1tYAVRBXEdc

Attached Files

 |

Powered by WordPress and MagTheme