+1 650 405 4067
Tag Archives: Proposition
Internet restrictions in Tunisia 2022 Best
This is a debate on internet restrictions in Tunisia in Tunisia and Egypt in 2011. Problem statement: After popular uprisings in Tunisia and Egypt in 2011, the US government said it would spend $30 million to fund the development of new services and technologies designed to allow activists in other countries to get around Internet restrictions imposed by their governments.
Internet restrictions in Tunisia
The US government should provide activists in other countries the tools to get around Internet restrictions imposed by authoritarian governments. Defend your stance for this proposition. Problem statement: After popular uprisings in Tunisia and Egypt in 2011, the US government said it would spend $30 million to fund the development of new services and technologies designed to allow activists in other countries to get around Internet restrictions imposed by their governments. Announcing this initiative, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said, “We are convinced that an open Internet fosters long-term peace, progress and prosperity.
Internet restrictions in Tunisia
The reverse is also true. An Internet that is closed and fractured, where different governments can block activity or change the rules on a whim—where speech is censored or punished, and privacy does not exist—that is an Internet that can cut off opportunities for peace and progress and discourage innovation and entrepreneurship” [1]. Debate the following proposition: The US government should provide activists in other countries the tools to get around Internet restrictions imposed by authoritarian governments. Defend your stance for this proposition. Note: Report should be 2 pages long. Use single column and single space format. Use Calibri font of size 12 points. https://youtu.be/53q3gscB7FM
Attached Files
|
Marijuana use and California Law. 2022 Best
This exercises explores marijuana use and California caw. The Federal Congress enacted the Controlled Substance Act, 21 U.S.C. §801 (CSA), as part of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970.
Marijuana use and California Law.
Critical Thinking Exercises. Marijuana use and California Law. The Federal Congress enacted the Controlled Substance Act, 21 U.S.C. §801 (CSA), as part of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970. CSA establishes or designates certain drugs as “controlled substances” and makes it unlawful to knowingly or intentionally “manufacture, distribute, dispense, or possess with intent to manufacture, distribute, or dispense, a controlled substance.” Essentially, the Federal Government has regulated the use, manufacturing, and dispensing of marijuana at the federal level and made it federal crime.
Marijuana use and California Law.
In response to the federal legislation, California voters passed two proposition which were both passed a few years apart from each other. The first, the Compassionate Use Act (CaCUA) and the second, California Proposition 64, the California Marijuana Legalization Initiative (CMLI), which passed in 2016. Proposition 64 legalized the recreational use of marijuana for adults aged 21 years or older, permitting smoking in a private home or at a business licensed for on-site marijuana consumption. Up to 28.5 grams of marijuana and 8 grams of concentrated marijuana are legal to possess under this measure.
Marijuana use and California Law.
An individual is permitted to grow up to six plants within a private home as long as the area is locked and not visible from a public place. In conjunction with the CaCUA which was intended “to ensure that patients and their primary caregivers who obtain and use marijuana for medical purposes upon the recommendation of a physician are not subject to criminal prosecution or sanction.” Ashley owns and operates The Smokehouse, a small local marijuana dispensary in a small town in California. She grows, cultivates and sells her organic marijuana locally at her small dispensary. She has a small, but loyal customer base.
Marijuana use and California Law.
The federal government, through the direction of the Federal Attorney General, raided The Smokehouse, seized all of Ashley grow supplies, product and has arrested Ashley for violating the Federal Controlled Substances Act. Ashley maintains that she cannot be prosecuted under federal law because she has complied with all state and local laws regarding marijuana manufacturing and dispensing. She also maintains that the federal government has exceeded its regulatory power under the United States Constitution. Is she correct? Please discuss? When answering please consider the following: What power does the federal government have to regulate the State of California and its residents? Where does the federal regulatory power come from? https://youtu.be/czTiHz6_kO8
Attached Files
|
