Tag Archives: published research studies

Evaluating nutritional status. 2023 Best

Evaluating nutritional status.

NR449 Evidence-Based Practice Skills Module: Nutrition. Evaluating nutritional status. Purpose :To encourage critical thinking, problem solving, and collaboration through the use of evidence-based practice studies.

Evaluating nutritional status.

NR449 Evidence-Based Practice Skills Module: Nutrition. Evaluating nutritional status. Purpose :To encourage critical thinking, problem solving, and collaboration through the use of evidence-based practice studies. Course outcomes: This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes. CO 1: Examine the sources of knowledge that contribute to professional nursing practice. (PO 7) CO 2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (POs 4 and 8) CO 3: Identify ethical issues common to research involving human subjects. (PO 6) CO 4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and clinical significance related to evidence-based practice.

Evaluating nutritional status.

(POs 4 and 8) CO 5: Recognize the role of research findings in evidence-based practice. (POs 7 and 8) Due date: Your faculty member will inform you when this assignment is due. The Late Assignment Policy applies to this assignment. Total points possible: 100 points Preparing the assignment Follow these guidelines when completing this assignment. Speak with your faculty member if you have questions. 1. Computer with internet access. 2. Recommend using Firefox browser and clearing your cookies and cache if you are accessing ATI on laptop or desktop computer. 3. Log into ATI, “My ATI”, and select the “Apply” tab.

Evaluating nutritional status.

Click on Skills Module 3.0 and title “Nutrition.” Click on the “Begin Lesson” tab. Open the “Evidence-Based Research” tab on the left side. 4. There is one (1) study under the Evidence-Based Practice tab. You may review the entire module, but this is not a priority for this assignment. Other main topics and accompanying studies are listed in the table below. 5. Choose one of the main topics from the table and then choose one (1) article for review under that main topic. Read the article chosen from the table below and answer one (1) of the topic questions listed.

Evaluating nutritional status.

a. What methods can be used to assess nutritional status? b. What methods can be used to identify those at risk for malnutrition? c. What specific health conditions increase the risk of malnutrition? d. What associations exist between nutritional status and health outcomes? e. What type of interventions improve adherence to recommendations on nutritional intake? Create a 2-3 page scholarly paper which supports the topic question you selected. Search for a current research article (less than 5 years) to support the topic question selected. The 2-3 page limit does not include title and reference pages. https://youtu.be/Fm15SkyOvtE

Attached Files

 |

professional nursing practice. 2022 Best

Professional nursing practice.

This paper explores professional nursing practice. The purpose of this initial paper is to briefly describe your search strategies when identifying two articles that pertain to an evidence-based practice topic of interest.

Professional nursing practice.

Paper instructions: Purpose The Topic Search Strategy paper is the first of three related assignments. The purpose of this initial paper is to briefly describe your search strategies when identifying two articles that pertain to an evidence-based practice topic of interest. Course outcomes: This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes. CO 1: Examine the sources of knowledge that contribute to professional nursing practice. (PO 7) CO 2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (POs 4 and 8) Due date: Your faculty member will inform you when this assignment is due.

Professional nursing practice.

The Late Assignment Policy applies to this assignment. Total points possible: 160 points Preparing the assignment: Follow these guidelines when completing this assignment. Speak with your faculty member if you have questions. 1) Students will be placed into groups by the end of the second week of the session. The groups will work together to select a practice problem of interest as the focus for the three RUA assignments in this course. The practice topic of interest will also be used to complete week 3 and week 5 independent student assignments, as well as a group PowerPoint presentation in week 7.

Professional nursing practice.

a. Individuals will complete this assignment independently for weeks 3 and 5. b. Teams must assure that members do not use the same articles when completing this assignment. c. Please make sure you do not duplicate articles within your group. d. Paper should be 3-4 content pages in length. Title and reference pages are required but are excluded from 3-4 -page length. 2) The paper will include the following sections: a. Clinical Question (45 points/28%) • Describe the problem. What is the focus of your group’s work? • Explain the significance of the problem in terms of patient outcomes. What health outcomes result from your problem?

Professional nursing practice.

Or what statistics document this is a problem? You may find support on websites for government or professional organizations. • PICOT question in support of the group topic. • State the purpose of your paper. What will your paper do or describe? This is like a problem statement. “The purpose of this paper is to . . .” b. Levels of Evidence (20 points/13%) • Identify the type of question being asked (therapy, prognosis, meaning, etc.). • What is the best type of evidence to answer that question (e.g., RCT, cohort study, qualitative study, etc.)? c. Search Strategy (65 points/41%) • List search terms and results. • Databases used (start with the CU library). Link your search with the PICOT question described above. https://youtu.be/DwQjztgGCuo

Professional nursing practice.

Refinement decisions. As you did your search, what decisions did you make in refinement to get your required articles down to a reasonable number for review? Were any limits used? If so, what? • Identification of two (2) most relevant articles (primary sources published within the last 5 years). d. Format (30 points/18%) • Correct grammar and spelling. • Include a title page. • Use of headings for each section. Clinical Question, Levels of Evidence, Search Strategy, and Conclusion • Adheres to current APA formatting and guidelines. • 3-4 pages in length, excluding title and reference pages. For writing assistance, visit the Writing Center.

Attached Files

 |

Powered by WordPress and MagTheme