Tag Archives: gender identity.

20th Century American Women Activists 2022 Best

20th Century American Women Activists.

This paper explores 20th Century American Women Activists. For your second formal history paper, select an individual or organization featured in Units 3, 4, or 5, who took civic action to fix one of the specific social, economic, or political problems featured in the units.

20th Century American Women Activists.

Due December 12th For your second formal history paper, select an individual or organization featured in Units 3, 4, or 5, who took civic action to fix one of the specific social, economic, or political problems featured in the units. Clearly identify and describe the single problem or issue around which they organized and acted. Then summarize, discuss, and compare the strategies and ideas they developed to fix the problem. What goals did they achieve? How were their views and work affected by their “social location”—their race, class, gender identity, ethnicity? What impact did they have on the course of history? What historical lesson/s about civic engagement do they offer us?

20th Century American Women Activists.

For paper 2, select a social problem & Individual or groups covered in Units 3, 4, 5– week 10-16. You should draw primarily from assigned course materials. Use both primary sources and secondary scholarship to support your discussion and assertions. You are encouraged to draw on relevant materials from the Women and Social Movements in the U.S., Database linked in the course E-Reader, and use assigned readings as a starting point. For general biographical information about individuals, reference the authoritative biographical dictionary, Notable American Women: A Biographical Dictionary, Volumes 1-5 (Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University).

20th Century American Women Activists.

Physical copies of each volume available in our library. Please avoid non-scholarly web-based sources such as history.com. **** Writing Guidelines & Expectations: AWAI papers should follow the conventions of good academic writing! Your AWAI papers should have an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Start your paper with an overarching topic sentence that immediately identifies the main focus of your paper—the social problem and activists you will feature. In your introduction, you should provide adequate historical context to orient the reader. (ie. some dates, terms, and a sense of what changed over time on this topic).

20th Century American Women Activists.

You should close the introduction with a thesis statement–a supportable generalization/big assertion about what the bulk of the evidence examined about your chosen civic activist/s proves about how they worked to solve the social problem. Organize the rest of your response into 7-10 well-developed paragraphs each containing a topic sentence that identifies your main idea in that paragraph, followed by supporting evidence from the course materials, and your own explanations of that material. Offer your own thoughts and evaluation of this evidence.

20th Century American Women Activists.

Remember that your supporting body paragraphs are supposed support what you asserted in your thesis statement in the introduction, while also adequately describing and contextualizing the work of these civic activists. If these groups or individuals worked in collaboration with, or were in conflict with others, that should be explained. Your conclusion should explain how you’ve proven your main argument and offer some reflection on the historical significance and impact of the civic activists you wrote about. What lesson/s about the historic role of women’s civic and social activism in American history will you take with you after studying this topic?

20th Century American Women Activists.

Format, Length, Stylistic, and Citation Requirements The Basics: Your paper should be 5-7 pages, double-spaced, 12 Pt. Times New Roman Font, standard black ink, standard 1” margins. Your prose should be crisp, clear, grammatical, and properly punctuated. Avoid unnecessary adjectives, adverbs, or flowery, fancy language. Be sure your sentences have a subject, verb, and object. Avoid passive voice, where its not clear who did or said what. Practice “economy of language.” Alert! You are writing a social science paper in the academic discipline of history. You should be writing in the past tense.

20th Century American Women Activists.

Keep your language as formal as possible. MOSTLY, avoid the use of first person singular, “I” and “My” statements. Avoid touch-feely, self-dismissing language. For example, “I feel like …” or “It might just be my opinion, but…” are two commonly bad ways to start a sentence in a formal academic paper. Don’t undercut the force of your assertions by admitting your ideas are based primarily on feelings or opinions rather than evaluation of evidence. Instead, make the historical subjects you are writing about THE subjects of your paper and your sentences. Similarly, make the evidence the basis of your assertions and statements. https://youtu.be/jNeZzoUYJUM

Attached Files

 |

International human rights law 2022 Best

International human rights law

This paper explores international human rights law, more specifically, the application of various international human rights instruments as it pertains to discrimination against persons, and thereby the treatment of those persons under law, on the basis of sexual orientation and/or gender identity.

International human rights law

Case Study Outline Chosen Topic – International human rights law, more specifically, the application of various international human rights instruments as it pertains to discrimination against persons, and thereby the treatment of those persons under law, on the basis of sexual orientation and/or gender identity. I. Introduction to Case: Toonen v. Australia; United Nations Human Rights Committee a. Brief Summary of Case i. Plaintiff’s allegations and reasons for filing complaint with the HRC (i.e: background, context, etc) ii. Issues raised and relevant instruments and/or case law relied upon by the Committee to reach their ruling.

International human rights law

iii. Result of the complaint – was it in favor of the Plaintiff or the Defendant. II. Discussion of Issues/Rights (Allegedly) Breached/Case Law: a. Right to be respected without regard for race, color, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth, or other status. (Art. 2, p. 1, ICCPR) b. Right to privacy/arbitrary interference. (Art. 17, ICCPR) c. Right to equality before the law. (Art. 26, ICCPR) d. Dudgeon vs. United Kingdom. e. Norris vs. Ireland. f. Modinos vs. Cyprus. g. Bhinder vs. Canada.

International human rights law

III. Implications and Real World Effects a. Implications and real world effects of the ruling in Toonen v. Australia (as well as the other cases cited) and its significance to the chosen topic. b. Discussion on the various rights the Committee and the other cases validated and upheld. IV. Conclusion a. Recap synopsis of case b. Summarize the various rights at play in the case and in this context of international law c. Provide further areas for improvement and/or advancement in the context of international law as it relates to the chosen topic. Sources to be used: 1. Cases cited above 2. European Court on Human Rights case law/website.

International human rights law

3. United Nations Human Rights Committee publications, reports, and cases. 4. ICCPR, UDHR, and other international human rights instruments. 5. American and or other national jurisprudence/case law as it relates to the concept of human rights and the rights referred to in the cases mentioned in the outline above, especially when said case law derives its conclusions from international legal precedence or instruments. 6. Class textbook, lectures, and slides. 7. News and media articles (NYT, Foreign Affairs, etc). 8. Academic journals and other peer reviewed materials. https://youtu.be/zEstWpA-HMg

Attached Files

 |

Powered by WordPress and MagTheme