+1 650 405 4067
Tag Archives: quality improvement initiative
Evaluate scholarly articles 2023 Best
Learning Objectives Students will: · Evaluate scholarly articles for a literature review · Analyze scholarly literature for evidence · Evaluate quality of evidence to inform practice change · Synthesize research to support nursing practice problems · Synthesize evidence to inform practice change.
Evaluate scholarly articles
Components of Evidence-Based Practice: This final component of evidence-based practice does not require literally assigning a grade. However, it does involve evaluating what level of evidence in quantity and quality can justify a particular practice change, and the time, effort, and expense of a quality improvement initiative. Each situation and grading scale may be different depending on the specific practice problem, the potential outcomes, the urgency of the problem, and the attitudes—encouraging or uncompromising—of the stakeholders.
Evaluate scholarly articles
This week you complete this module with a critical assessment of the evidence from your literature review. Both in your Discussion with colleagues and your module Assignment, the strength and substance of what links your practice problem, evidence to address it, and the need for a practice change initiative, will be yours to explain and grade. Learning Objectives Students will: · Evaluate scholarly articles for a literature review · Analyze scholarly literature for evidence · Evaluate quality of evidence to inform practice change · Synthesize research to support nursing practice problems · Synthesize evidence to inform practice change.
Evaluate scholarly articles
Justify quality improvement/practice change initiatives Clarifying Connections: Practice Problem, Evidence, Changing Practice Your literature review should be completed at this point in the module. Working from that assumption, you will use this Discussion to share your preliminary outcomes and analysis from your literature review with colleagues for their comment. You may choose to incorporate feedback from peers before submitting your Module Assignment on Day 7, although that is not required. The aim of this Discussion is to support you in providing the kind of analysis, evaluation, and synthesis of evidence to a group that would be involved in presenting a quality improvement initiative to stakeholders.
Evaluate scholarly articles
To prepare: · Review the Module 4 Learning Resources with guidance for analyzing and synthesizing evidence from your literature review. · Complete your analysis of outcomes and synthesis of evidence to inform a practice change. · Consider the linkage between your practice problem, evidence to address it, and the need for a practice change initiative. · Assess the strength of this linkage and how to present it to colleagues. With these thoughts in mind … ASSIGNMENT: Post an explanation of the results of your literature review and the connection to your practice problem. Then, explain your synthesis of evidence on which to base a practice change, and the need for a practice change initiative. https://youtu.be/f64P3hHdSAc
Attached Files
|
Different evaluation methods 2022 Best
For this assignment we will describe different evaluation methods for a healthcare quality improvement initiative, justify this method after its initial launch date, and discuss how evaluation methods for this initiative should change over time.
Different evaluation methods
Throughout this module, you have been learning about evaluation methods. In this assignment, you will describe different evaluation methods for a healthcare quality improvement initiative, justify this method after its initial launch date, and discuss how evaluation methods for this initiative should change over time. By successfully completing this assignment, you will gain the knowledge and skills required to complete a portion of your project due later in this course. For the purposes of this assignment, imagine that you are employed in the quality department of a hospital.
Different evaluation methods
Your hospital recently implemented an ongoing professional practice evaluation (OPPE) using criteria specific to The Joint Commission medical staff standard. The Joint Commission (E-dition) standard that is applied during the OPPE is: Introduction to Standard MS.08.01.03 Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation The ongoing professional practice evaluation allows the organization to identify professional practice trends that impact on quality of care and patient safety. Such identification may require intervention by the organized medical staff. The criteria used in the ongoing professional practice evaluation may include the following:
Different evaluation methods
Review of operative and other clinical procedure(s) performed and their outcomes Pattern of blood and pharmaceutical usage (obtain from laboratory and pharmacy directors, respectively) Requests for tests and procedures Length of stay patterns Morbidity and mortality data Practitioner’s use of consultants Other relevant criteria as determined by the organized medical staff The information used in the ongoing professional practice evaluation may be acquired through the following: Periodic chart review Direct observation Monitoring of diagnostic and treatment techniques Discussion with other individuals involved in the care of each patient.
Different evaluation methods
Including consulting physicians, assistants at surgery, and nursing and administrative personnel As a result of the OPPE process, it was found that two credentialed providers, two urology surgeons specifically, have been found to be deficient on the OPPE in the area of infections: both surgeons’ post-operative urosurgery patients have been experiencing antibiotic-resistant urinary tract infections. Not only does this impact the quality of the care per the standards, but it can also impact the social marketing of the hospital, increase the costs of care, increase patient length of stay, and decrease reimbursement.
Different evaluation methods
Therefore, your task is to recommend an evaluation method for 3, 6, and 12 months intended to evaluate the reduction in infection rates as part of a quality improvement initiative. Then, you will need to justify your evaluation method and why the method(s) should be employed after the initiative launch. Lastly, you will discuss how this evaluation method should change over time to accurately assess the initiative over time. As you complete this assignment, reflect on the following: How do you address the urinary tract infection rates in periods of 3, 6, and 12 months, and how will you lay out a plan for these urology surgeons?
Different evaluation methods
After all, the medical executive committee (MEC) of your hospital is held accountable to fulfill the OPPE requirements. If these two surgeons continue to have post-operative patients with infections, the MEC will determine what happens next. The MEC is committed to reducing patient harm and, specifically, they are committed to having an active OPPE process to drive quality improvements. Prompt Write a memo that is to be shared with the MEC. This memo will discuss the evaluation methods that could be employed to address the situation described in the scenario. Use at least two scholarly sources to support your claims. https://youtu.be/B9RgBpsgBkA
Different evaluation methods
Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria: Evaluation methods at 3, 6, and 12 months: Recommend evaluation methods for reducing infection rates as a quality improvement initiative at 3, 6, and 12 months. Justify an evaluation method: Justify an evaluation method for healthcare quality improvement initiative at 3, 6, and 12 months after initiative launch. Why evaluation methods change: Discusses how evaluation methods for healthcare quality improvement initiatives should change over time, depending on the change of infection rates over time.
Attached Files
|
The NPSG standards 2022 Best
In this assignment, you will explore the NPSG standards related to patient identification, which states facilities will use at least two patient identifiers before procedures.
The NPSG standards
Paper instructions: Overview Dashboards are data visualizations that healthcare organizations use to measure and analyze data. The Joint Commission (E-dition) sets standards for healthcare quality and safety. One set of standards The Joint Commission created is the National Patient Safety Goals (NPSG), which are designed for different facilities and are critical to maintain accreditation. In this assignment, you will explore the NPSG standards related to patient identification, which states facilities will use at least two patient identifiers before procedures. This assignment will help prepare you for your course project through the analysis of data, dashboards, and industry standards.
The NPSG standards
Please note: The Joint Commission standards you have access to are the standards for acute care facilities and not long-term care. In this assignment, the standards for patient identification are the same for acute care and long-term care facilities. Prompt Examine the dashboard for ABC Residential Center, which is a long-term care center. Analyze the facility metrics against the national benchmarks and address the following areas. Provide at least two scholarly sources to support your claims. Three bar graphs depicting the National Average of Residential Centers That Used Two Patient Identifiers Percentage by Month, ABC Residential Center Used Two Patient Identifiers Percentage by Month.
The NPSG standards
State Average of Residential Centers That Used Two Patient Identifiers Percentage by Month respectively and one line graph for Residential Centers That Used Two Patient Identifiers Percentage by Month, and another radar graph depicting Residential Centers That Used Two Patient Identifiers Percentage by Month. A text-only version is available: Module Three Short Paper Graphic Text-Only Version Word Document Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria: Insights from dashboards: Describe how the data in the dashboard could be used by ABC Residential Center to find insights related to their operations or quality of care.
The NPSG standards
Dashboard techniques: Discuss what visualization techniques (such as using charts and graphs; color coding the data red, yellow, and green; and combining multiple sets of data into one graph) were used by the dashboard to provide a quick, visual way to understand the data presented, and if there are additional techniques you would recommend for the dashboard to use to make the data easier and quicker to understand. Determining benchmarks: Determine a benchmark for patient identification for ABC (you should review the NPSG standards). Defend selection: Provide a rationale for your selection of a benchmark.
The NPSG standards
If you chose a benchmark less than 100%, how would you defend that benchmark to the public? Meeting the benchmark: Analyze the data in the dashboard to determine if ABC is meeting the benchmark. Implications: Discuss the implications of not meeting the benchmark. Justify creating a quality improvement initiative: Justify the creation of a quality improvement initiative using the dashboard and NPSG standards if ABC is not meeting the benchmark (you don’t need to create the quality improvement initiative, rather you need to justify the need for one to meet the benchmark if it is not being met).
The NPSG standards
Guidelines for Submission Submit this assignment as a 2 page Microsoft Word document. You must also include an APA-style title page. Use 12-point Times New Roman font, double spacing, and one-inch margins. If you need writing support, you can access the Online Writing Center through the Academic Support module of your course. Citations 2021 Comprehensive Accreditation Manual for Hospitals (Camh Hard Copy). (2020). [E-book]. JCR Publishing. https://e-dition.jcrinc.com/MainContent.aspx. https://youtu.be/c2UgbS1kUjA
Attached Files
|
