Tag Archives: Utilitarianism

Smart Homes and Devices in Healthcare. 2023 Best

Smart Homes and Devices in Healthcare.

The Ethics of Smart Homes and Devices in Healthcare. Building on the research you conducted for the annotated bibliography, write a paper of 1000 to 1200 words discussing the ethical issues related to your selected technology that are occurring now or will likely occur in the future.

Smart Homes and Devices in Healthcare.

The Ethics of Smart Homes and Devices in Healthcare. Building on the research you conducted for the annotated bibliography, write a paper of 1000 to 1200 words discussing the ethical issues related to your selected technology that are occurring now or will likely occur in the future. Make sure to include relevant findings from the scholarly sources you used in Part 2 and any other sources you wish to use. You must use at least four relevant sources to support your paper.

Consider how the legal issues (freedom of expression, copyright, right to privacy, etc.) we have been discussing relate to your selected technology. Using one or more of the ethical frameworks (utilitarianism, deontology, virtue ethics, social justice and social contract theory), propose a policy for addressing the ethical issues related to the new or emerging technology. Cite your sources using either MLA or APA format. https://youtu.be/12BiFNIVs6I

Attached Files

 |

Elevated testosterone levels 2023 Best

Elevated testosterone levels

The main ethical issues here are: 1) Should intersexed individuals (or those with elevated testosterone levels) be allowed to compete with female athletes on the international stage (and elsewhere)?

Elevated testosterone levels

Topic #2 – Running Away from the Competition. The main ethical issues here are: 1) Should intersexed individuals (or those with elevated testosterone levels) be allowed to compete with female athletes on the international stage (and elsewhere)? 2) Would banning these individuals from competition be a violation of their rights? Would allowing them to compete be a violation of the rights of the other athletes? What should be in your paper: 1) A discussion of the background history and present situation. 2) A discussion of the main ethical issues noted above, utilizing concepts of global ethics (for example, “rights,” “utilitarianism,” etc.).

Elevated testosterone levels

3) Some statement of your feelings on the matter, supported by facts and concepts of global ethics. Some sources to get you started (I expect you to include sources other than these!): 1) Search “intersex athletes” using the fUSIon library catalog: https://www.usi.edu/library. You will find LOTS of useful information there. You can also look up the specific athletes mentioned in the case study, Dutee Chand and Caster Semenya, for more information on their specific cases. There are other athletes out there who have been impacted by these discussions.

Elevated testosterone levels

2) Here is the most recent IAAF ruling on testosterone eligibility regulations for “female classification” in athletic competitions. https://www.worldathletics.org/news/press-release/eligibility-regulations-for-femaleclassifica. See also links within this document that provide more detail on the regulations. 3) https://www.womenssportsfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/participation-of-intersex-athletesin-womens-sports.pdf 4) https://theconversation.com/ten-ethical-flaws-in-the-caster-semenya-decision-on-intersex-in-sport116448 5) https://digitalcommons.law.wne.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1257&context=fac scholhttps://youtu.be/phHdLtStjS8

Attached Files

 |

Shareholder Theory and Stakeholder Theory 2022 Best

Shareholder Theory and Stakeholder Theory

This paper addresses the following questions (in the order given): 1) Contrast Shareholder Theory and Stakeholder Theory: How does each theory claim that a corporation should be managed?

Shareholder Theory and Stakeholder Theory

In Your 3 Page (single spaced) Essay, please address the following questions (in the order given): 1) Contrast Shareholder Theory and Stakeholder Theory: How does each theory claim that a corporation should be managed? What is the goal or objective of corporate management according to each theory? How does this relate to the idea of corporate social (or ethical) responsibility (CSR)? 2) Consider the brief case study outlined above: What would Shareholder Theory recommend companies like Uber and Lyft do in this case? What would Stakeholder Theory recommend these companies do?

Shareholder Theory and Stakeholder Theory

3) Consider the Business Roundtable Statement: Was the Business Roundtable right to issue the August 2019 statement in support of Stakeholder Theory (and to reject their previous endorsement of Shareholder Theory)? Why? Which theory offers the better approach for framing the responsibilities of business within society? 4) Apply Your Worldview: Which ethical theory [Utilitarianism (Mill) or Deontology (Kant)] mostly justifies your view of the Business Roundtable statement? Explain how that ethical theory supports your position, and what the other ethical theory would recommend.

Shareholder Theory and Stakeholder Theory

Business Roundtable Statement 2019: The debate about corporate social responsibility (CSR), or whether corporations themselves have any social or ethical responsibilities, can be understood as centering around the debate between Shareholder Theory and Stakeholder Theory. Economist Milton Friedman argues against the idea of CSR, based on Shareholder Theory and the doctrine of “shareholder primacy,” while author Edward Freeman argues in favor of CSR, based on Stakeholder Theory and the claim that corporations have obligations to a range of different stakeholders. In August 2019, the Business Roundtable issued a new statement on corporate governance.

Shareholder Theory and Stakeholder Theory

The Business Roundtable is an association whose members include the CEOs of America’s leading corporations, among them Jeff Bezos (Amazon), Tim Cook (Apple), Mary Bara (General Motors), and many others. The August 2019 statement, signed by nearly 200 CEOs, commits to managing corporations for the benefit of all stakeholders, including customers, employees, suppliers, communities, and shareholders. In other words, the statement is an endorsement of Stakeholder Theory, and represents a major shift from the Roundtable’s previous endorsement of Shareholder Theory.

Shareholder Theory and Stakeholder Theory

The Business Roundtable statement can be found here: https://www.businessroundtable.org/business-roundtable-redefines-the-purpose-of-a-corporation to-promote-an-economy-that-serves-all-americans News coverage of the statement can be found here: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/19/business/business-roundtable-ceos-corporations.html Debate about the statement can be heard in this segment from CNBC: https://www.cnbc.com/video/2019/08/26/business-roundtable-role-of-companies-shareholder values-squawk-box.html Case Study: Uber and Lyft drivers are classified as independent contractors, rather than employees.

Shareholder Theory and Stakeholder Theory

Companies are not legally obligated to provide workers who are classified as independent contractors with the benefits owed to regular employees. Therefore, Uber and Lyft drivers are not legally entitled to sick leave. During the coronavirus pandemic, this may force drivers to make a choice between driving and not getting paid. Drivers can have a range of reasons that make them fearful to drive in the current situation. One driver is HIV-positive and has a weakened immune system, putting him at higher risk of severe symptoms or death if he contracts the virus. https://youtu.be/vD9XJKZmXEs

Shareholder Theory and Stakeholder Theory

Another driver was recently notified that he has been in contact with someone who tested positive for coronavirus, and fears he may pose a risk to his passengers. A third driver has started coughing, sneezing, and has a slight temperature, and is worried that she may have the virus and could infect passengers. However, since these drivers are independent contractors, rather than employees, they are not entitled to sick leave, should they decide not to drive.

 

 

Attached Files

 |

Running Away from the Competition. 2022 Best

Running Away from the Competition.

Our topic #2 will be Running Away from the Competition. The main ethical issues here are: 1) Should intersexed individuals (or those with elevated testosterone levels) be allowed to compete with female athletes on the international stage (and elsewhere)?

Running Away from the Competition.

The main ethical issues here are: 1) Should intersexed individuals (or those with elevated testosterone levels) be allowed to compete with female athletes on the international stage (and elsewhere)? 2) Would banning these individuals from competition be a violation of their rights? Would allowing them to compete be a violation of the rights of the other athletes? What should be in your paper: 1) A discussion of the background history and present situation. 2) A discussion of the main ethical issues noted above, utilizing concepts of global ethics (for example, “rights,” “utilitarianism,” etc.).

Running Away from the Competition.

3) Some statement of your feelings on the matter, supported by facts and concepts of global ethics. Some sources to get you started (I expect you to include sources other than these!): 1) Search “intersex athletes” using the fUSIon library catalog: https://www.usi.edu/library. You will find LOTS of useful information there. You can also look up the specific athletes mentioned in the case study, Dutee Chand and Caster Semenya, for more information on their specific cases. There are other athletes out there who have been impacted by these discussions.

Running Away from the Competition.

2) Here is the most recent IAAF ruling on testosterone eligibility regulations for “female classification” in athletic competitions. https://www.worldathletics.org/news/press-release/eligibility-regulations-for-femaleclassifica. See also links within this document that provide more detail on the regulations. 3) https://www.womenssportsfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/participation-of-intersex-athletesin-womens-sports.pdf 4) https://theconversation.com/ten-ethical-flaws-in-the-caster-semenya-decision-on-intersex-in-sport116448 5) https://digitalcommons.law.wne.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1257&context=fac schol. https://youtu.be/cZ9YAFYIBOU

Attached Files

 |

The opioid crisis 2022 Best

The opioid crisis

This assignment explores whether the opioid crisis is best understood as a problem of criminality, or a problem of public health. A good ethics paper will engage with three things, (1) the prompt, (2) concepts and (3) moral theory (e.g., utilitarianism or Kantian ethics).

The opioid crisis

Writing Criteria Length: 600 words minimum, excluding work cited page, name, date, etc. (~3 pages) Format: Calibiri, 12 pt. font Is the opioid crisis best understood as a problem of criminality, or a problem of public health? Explain your answer. Citations: As long as you are consistent you may use the citation style you are familiar with (APA, MLA, Chicago Style, etc.). Sources: You must use a minimum of two sources (they may all come from the Vaughn textbook). For example, you may cite the Vaughn reading from Abortion (pp. 339-351) and Thomson’s article “A Defense of Abortion” (pp. 357-367).

The opioid crisis

Hint: A good ethics paper will engage with three things, (1) the prompt, (2) concepts and (3) moral theory (e.g., utilitarianism or Kantian ethics). Furthermore, you should clearly state your position in the opening paragraph. This could be that you agree, disagree, or that you take some other third approach. Grading Rubric Clear thesis statement Clearly explains relevant concepts Accurately outlines moral theories Answers the question(s) in the paper prompt.

The opioid crisis

Clear argument supported by textual sources. Spelling, grammar, and proper citations. Things to Avoid Fallacious Reasoning Appeals to emotion, Anecdotal Data or Experiences, etc. Do not fall into the trap of legal justification. This is an ethics paper, not a law paper. Plagiarism A bad or late paper is better than no paper, but a plagiarized paper is inexcusable and may result in an F for the entire course. https://youtu.be/Nf9NspiAfBA

Attached Files

 |

Powered by WordPress and MagTheme