+1 650 405 4067
Tag Archives: exegesis
The scientific revolution 2023 Best
The scientific revolution , Natural Philosophy Cures Itself Rev, 119-14. Directions: Why might the credibility of science depend on its being regarded as socially and/or politically neutral? Do you think science is socially and/or politically neutral?
The scientific revolution
Directions: Why might the credibility of science depend on its being regarded as socially and/or politically neutral? Do you think science is socially and/or politically neutral? Can you think of any ways that science either impacts or is impacted by social and political values? Your Initial Post: 1. State what you think is the main point or thesis of the article assigned for reading the day this discussion is due. 2. Explain why you think that, and provide textual justification for your claim in the form of exegesis, not direct quotation.
3. Share some critical remarks about the article. What did the author overlook, get wrong, or what are some potential implications of the author’s claims that may be problematic in some way? https://youtu.be/vzo8vnxSARg
Attached Files
|
Philosophy of Science 2023 Best
This paper explores philosophy of Science & Scientific Entry’s. Directions: Describe one scientific entity (scientist, discipline, or subject) that deserves to be regarded as authoritative. Why do you think they deserve this?
Philosophy of Science
Directions: Describe one scientific entity (scientist, discipline, or subject) that deserves to be regarded as authoritative. Why do you think they deserve this? Explain. Now describe an entity that purports to be scientific (a pseudo-science or scientist), but which doesn’t deserve to be regarded as authoritative. Why do they not deserve this? Explain. Then answer the additional questions below in regards to the reading below.
Philosophy of Science
Pages 1-30 from the The Scientific Revolution, 2nd ed., by Steven Shapin, The University of Chicago Press, 2018. (Rev) 1. State what you think is the main point or thesis of the reading assigned above. 2. Explain why you think that, and provide textual justification for your claim in the form of exegesis, not direct quotation. 3. Share some critical remarks about the article. What did the author overlook, get wrong, or what are some potential implications of the author’s claims that may be problematic in some way? https://youtu.be/NmKLZ0eZpdY
Attached Files
|
