+1 650 405 4067
Tag Archives: Supreme Court
Writing a comparative essay 2022 Best
This assignment involves writing a comparative essay between this 2 buildings Oscar Niemeyer, Plaza of the Three Powers, Brasilia, 1958 Teodoro Gonzalez de Leon, Supreme Court, Mexico City, 1987-92 What were the climate or contexts of the two projects you analyze?
Writing a comparative essay
Writer’s Choice Paper details: Write a comparative essay between this 2 buildings Oscar Niemeyer, Plaza of the Three Powers, Brasilia, 1958 Teodoro Gonzalez de Leon, Supreme Court, Mexico City, 1987-92 What were the climate or contexts of the two projects you analyze? b. Who built each of them? When? Where? Why? c. What are the similarities and differences between the two projects? d. What were the primary technological, economic, cultural, and/or social values of the culture or region that allowed each project to be possible?
Writing a comparative essay
e. Why are they unique structurally, spatially, programmatically, or artistically? f. Provide analysis of details, layouts, forms, volumes, programs, or surroundings of the two projects. 3. Based on your findings, write an academic paper. a. 750-1000 words. Time-New Roman or Cambria 11 or 12. Double line spacing. b. You need a title / thesis statement / main analysis / conclusion c. This is an academic paper. Avoid first-person pronouns (I, we, my, etc.)
Writing a comparative essay
d. For citation, use Chicago Manual or MLA. ( https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/resources.html) e. You may include hand drawings, plans, elevations, etc. f. Proofreading is essential. Ask your friend to read yours before submission. g. The assignment is due December 20 A single pdf file. https://youtu.be/38ygVdNIiGY
Attached Files
|
Dynamic Court View 2022 Best
The goal of this assignment is for students to apply the concepts of the Dynamic Court View or Constrained Court View to one of the cases below. In the end, you will thoroughly research the case you selected as well as the apparent influences on the Supreme Court resulting in the decision.
Dynamic Court View
Political Science 130g Paper details: Nature of the Assignment: The goal of this assignment is for students to apply the concepts of the Dynamic Court View or Constrained Court View to one of the cases below. In the end, you will thoroughly research the case you selected as well as the apparent influences on the Supreme Court resulting in the decision. You may only select from the following case: Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization (2022) Your paper must include the following components: (1) provide an introduction that includes a strong thesis statement setting forth the position you will take relative to your case;
Dynamic Court View
(2) summarize your case, including who are the parties, the main legal claims presented and how the court resolved them; (3) set forth the elements of either the DCV or CCV model depending on which model fits your case; (4) analyze your case in light of the elements from either a DCV or CCV perspective (this is where you need to incorporate the research you discovered on the various elements of DCV or CCV); (5) develop and rebut the most persuasive counter-argument(s) and (6) offer the broader implications about your analysis, in other words, what does your case study tell us about the conditions under which the Supreme Court is more likely to be “dynamic” versus “constrained.”
Dynamic Court View
Logistics of the Paper: Papers must be 10 to 12 pages in length, double spaced, on 8 ½ by 11-inch paper, using a 12-point, legible font (such as New Times Roman or Courier). Every paper must have a title page that includes a title, the student’s name, the student’s TA, and the section time. Neither the title page nor the Work Cited page count toward your total page count. All papers must be stabled in the upper left corner (no folders). Any paper less than 10 full pages will be marked down ½ grade (5 pts).
Dynamic Court View
Caveat: You will be graded in part on the quality and quantity of your research. You may cite scholarly (peer-reviewed) sources and non-scholarly sources, although scholarly sources are viewed as more valid and therefore more valuable to your analysis. You must also properly cite all sources using a Work Cited page with parenthetical citations, including internal page cites. Please follow MLA format. https://youtu.be/mQllmb-0Lnk
Attached Files
|
Debating the Exclusionary Rule. 2022 Best
For this assignment we will focus on debating the exclusionary rule. This is a 3-page (minimum) paper exploring the pros and cons of the Exclusionary Rule. We know that the Rule is not in the Constitution, but rather it is a rule of law set by the Supreme Court.
Debating the Exclusionary Rule.
Paper instructions: This is a 3-page (minimum) paper exploring the pros and cons of the Exclusionary Rule. Review the textbook, at least TWO outside sources, and the following video to research the Exclusionary Rule. (Mapp v. Ohio). Using that information, write a 3-page (minimum) paper, in APA formatting, addressing the following: Explain the Exclusionary Rule and the constitutional basis for its creation. Present a discussion regarding the justifications and continued use of the Exclusionary Rule. Specifically, identify two (2) reasons for its continued use and two (2) reasons to stop using the rule.
Debating the Exclusionary Rule.
We know that the Exclusionary Rule is not in the Constitution, but rather it is a rule of law set by the Supreme Court. It could be changed by any Supreme Court now or in the future. Explain whether you would like to see the rule changed, and why. You may write this section in 1st person. Finally, we know that, just because evidence may be excluded at trial due to the operation of the Exclusionary Rule, the prosecution does not necessarily end. Explain why that is the case. Explain whether you https://youtu.be/9g4LRe6rLNQ agree or disagree that the prosecution should end if any evidence is suppressed? Defend your answer. You may write this section in 1st person.
Attached Files
|
Judicial Review in Australia 2022 Best
For this assignment we will discuss the process of judicial review in Australia from the beginning to the end. In the United States, judicial review serves to invalidate laws enacted by Congress – enforced by the executive branch that violate the US Constitution.
Judicial Review in Australia
Paper instructions: In the United States, judicial review serves to invalidate laws enacted by Congress – enforced by the executive branch that violate the US Constitution. So, if Congress enacts a law that is unconstitutional and the executive branch attempts to enforce it, affected citizens can challenge the law’s validity in federal courts – potentially all the way to the Supreme Court. This particularly important with respect to laws that infringe on human rights that are guaranteed by the US Constitution. Although the governments of other democracies around the world have their own constitutions that to varying degrees guarantee their citizens human rights, their system of judicial review varies and is not the same in each country.
Judicial Review in Australia
For example, in Canada, the Canadian Supreme Court cannot exercise judicial review with respect to a law that expressly prohibits such review. In France, a Constitutional Council considers the constitutionality of laws before they take effect that are referred to the council by the president, prime minister, and heads of the two chambers of parliament. Similarly, in Germany and Italy, prior review of laws before they come into effect is also available in Germany and Italy, if requested by the national or a regional government.
Judicial Review in Australia
On the other hand, as stated above, in the US, the Supreme Court does not determine the constitutionality of U.S. laws unless there is an actual case brought before it. For this assignment, to receive full credit, you must address all the points set forth below in order. Turnitin checks all submissions for plagiarism which includes papers submitted by other students. Plagiarism is cheating. Paraphrasing a reference will not earn you many points. Do the research and articulate your thoughts in your words. Assignment: (1) Chose a country in which there is judicial review – either the countries mentioned above (other than the United States) or (2) any other country such as Switzerland, Australia, Japan, etc..
Judicial Review in Australia
(2) In a minimum 250-word post, please: (a) Identify the authority (constitution, statute or otherwise) by which the court hears cases involving constitutional issues;; (b) describe the process of judicial review from the beginning to the end; (c) discuss a court case in which a human right issue was addressed preferably from the country you chose, or if you are unable to find one, from another country other than the US,; and (d) propose at least one action (not already implemented) that the judicial review system of that country can take to better promote human rights. In completing this assignment, make sure that you address each point in order. https://youtu.be/ttJOVJUkUxU
Attached Files
|
Memorandum of Law. 2022 Best
This criminal law assignment involves writing a memorandum of Law. Overview This assignment requires application of case law related to a pre-trial line up. You will learn how to read decisions of the United States Supreme Court
Memorandum of Law.
Criminal Law Memorandum of Law Assignment Instructions Overview This assignment requires application of case law related to a pre-trial line up. You will learn how to read decisions of the United States Supreme Court and apply them to a fact pattern designed to simulate a legal issue that would be encountered in a law firm. You will then complete an objective memorandum of law that will answer whether the pre-trial line up in your given scenario will be admissible in court. Instructions You will research and read United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 (1967) and Kirby v. Illinois, 406 U.S. 682 (1972) and apply the rule of law from those cases to the following scenario:
Memorandum of Law
You are a paralegal in a law firm and have been assigned to a criminal defense matter. Your client, John Smith, is a 30 year old white male, approximately 5’9’’ tall, and weighs 175 pounds. He has brown hair, brown eyes, and a mustache. According to John, on October 19, 2020, he was just finishing his shift at 2:30 am as a bartender at O’Mally’s Pub located at 123 Circle Street in Lynchburg, Virginia. John usually walks back to his apartment which is located at 145 Prince Street, approximately 3 blocks away from the pub.
The United States Post Office is located at 100 Circle Street, and is between the Pub and John’s home. John usually passes the Post Office on his way home after his shifts.
Memorandum of Law
John claims that he arrived home around 3:00 am and went to bed. He says that no one was with him. The next day, when John arrived at work, he was surprised to see a police officer in the pub. The police officer asked to speak with him and indicated that John was a suspect in a breaking and entering of the post office the night before. The officer told John that the post office had been broken into around 2:45 am and that someone had forced their way into the building with a pry bar, and had pried upon several post office boxes and taken many pieces of mail.
Memorandum of Law
A witness had identified a man running from the scene that met John’s general description. The witness, Emily Jones, indicated that she observed a white male subject, who was about 180 lbs and about 5’10’’ with brown hair and a mustache run out of the post office after an alarm went off around 2:45am. The man that she saw was wearing a blue jacket, blue jeans and a black hat. He was carrying several pieces of mail. The witness indicated that she believed that she could identify the suspect if she saw him again. John denied any involvement in the break in and refused to speak further with the officer.
Memorandum of Law
The officer then left, and John went back to working his shift. A few hours later, police two police officers arrived back at the pub and told John that they had a warrant for his arrest. They explained that they had obtained a search warrant for John’s Apartment and that upon searching the apartment, they discovered several pieces of mail that were stolen from the post office. John was arrested and taken to the police station where he was subjected to a line-up. John did not have an attorney and he was not advised of any right to counsel for the line-up.
Memorandum of Law
The line up was conducted in a standard manner in which John and six other similarly sized individuals were placed in a room facing a one way mirror. They were each wearing blue jeans and white t-shirts. They were told to face the mirror, to turn left and right, and each was called to step forward toward the mirror in turn. John was identified by Emily Jones as the individual who she had seen running from the post office with the mail. You have been asked by your senior attorney to review United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 (1967) and Kirby v. Illinois, 406 U.S. 682 (1972) and to write a memorandum of law detailing whether the line-up would be admissible in court. https://youtu.be/gebtdgoBF5M
Attached Files
|
Gideon vs Wainwright court case.2022 Best
This paper examines Gideon vs Wainwright court case. Paper details: MUST USE The Struggle for Democracy, 2018 Elections and Updates Edition as a source In Part I, choose a case from your state that involves civil rights or civil liberties that was decided by the United States Supreme Court.
Gideon vs Wainwright court case.
Paper details: MUST USE The Struggle for Democracy, 2018 Elections and Updates Edition as a source In Part I, choose a case from your state that involves civil rights or civil liberties that was decided by the United States Supreme Court. If your state does not have a case that was decided by the United States Supreme Court, choose a civil rights case from another state for which the United States Supreme Court issued a decision. Here is a brief description of civil rights and civil liberties: Civil rights refers to equal social opportunities under the law.
Gideon vs Wainwright court case.
It gives you these freedoms such as the right to vote, the right to public education, or a fair trial, among other things, regardless of your wealth or race. Civil liberties mean freedom of religion, equal treatment and due process under the law, and the right to privacy. You should be able to go online and look up your state and famous cases decided by the Supreme Court. For example, Brown v Board of Education (1951) started in Topeka, Kansas and ended up in the Supreme Court of the United States.
Gideon vs Wainwright court case.
Another example would be Calvary Chapel Dayton Valley v Steve Sisolak, Governor of Nevada (2020) that started in Nevada and ended up the United States Supreme Court. A good source of information about cases decided by the United States Supreme Court is www.scotusblog.com. Other sources can be researched online using search terms for “civil rights cases decided by the U.S. Supreme Court.” Be sure to use a case actually decided by the United States Supreme Court, and not a case decided by your state’s supreme court or a different court. A case that is still pending before the United States Supreme Court should not be used.
Gideon vs Wainwright court case.
If you are unsure, please contact your Professor BEFORE you pick your case and submit the assignment as this is a significant part of your overall grade. Research your court case and write an outline of the case that you will be using to prepare a presentation, which will either be a narrated PowerPoint, a Kaltura Video, or some other format as approved by your instructor. If you are unsure, then verify the presentation format with your instructor before starting work on this assignment. This week’s assignment should include (a) summary of the case; (b) a case outline; and a summary.
Gideon vs Wainwright court case.
A. Summary of the Case In one or two paragraphs, provide a general overview of the case that serves as a snapshot of what the case is about and how it ended up in your state high court. A summary is using your words to write a brief history of the case. Do not give your opinion or your interpretation but stick to the facts only. B: Case Outline Your court case outline should include: Title: Name of the case Facts of the case: Provide key facts involving the case. History of the case: What legal action was taken based on what your state laws say about this case?
Gideon vs Wainwright court case.
Legal questions: What were the legal issues the court had to decide? Decision or holdings: Did the court decide for the plaintiff or the defendant? Explain the reason behind the decision? Verdict and opinion (judgement): What were the concurring and dissenting opinions? How many judges decided for the defendant and how many justices decided against the defendant? What was the final verdict from the judge or the jury, if it was a jury trial? C. Conclusion What was the resulting impact of the ruling? How did the citizens of your state benefit from it? Was this a good decision? Writing Requirements (APA format) The length of your outline will vary.
Gideon vs Wainwright court case.
Usually an outline is anywhere from 1-3 pages long. Make sure to write full sentences to explain your case. It is a concise list to be used as a reference for you during the presentation. Using the outline, you will be describing the court case in your presentation and the scenario around the court case. The use of Wikipedia as a primary source of information is to be avoided – it is not a reliable source of information. Search for an example of a case outline in the Internet.
Gideon vs Wainwright court case.
Without going into much detail at this state, each of the items listed above has a subject sentence with 3-6 bullet points that can help you expand on the topic. For Week 7, you will be creating a narrated PowerPoint, or a video as approved by your instructor, from this week’s outline. This assignment is worth 200 points. 1-inch margins Double spaced.https://youtu.be/3YSypB3nP2g
Attached Files
|
