+1 650 405 4067
Tag Archives: books
Organization corporate reputation review. 2023 Best
The aim of this paper is to complete an organization corporate reputation review. This review should include the following sections. Organization Introduction Briefly introduce your selected organization.
Organization corporate reputation review.
Directions Each student should complete an organization corporate reputation review. This review should include the following sections. Organization Introduction Briefly introduce your selected organization. Include a brief review of the organization’s history, description of product or services, mission, vision, and values, current organizational chart, and description of facilities. Reputation Review Using the Corporate Reputation Quotient (Fombrum et al.999) or Sport Team Reputation Model (Jang et al., 2015) each student will evaluate the selected organization’s reputation based on all the components of the model they select.
Organization corporate reputation review.
The model you will select will depend on the sport organization you review. Please note both selections are submitted as one paper. Think of each section as a level one heading in APA format. As part of your review, use appropriate sources from scholarly journals, trade journals, books, newspapers, magazines, newspapers, and other sources. Each review should evaluate the organization used the six reputation quotient drivers and driver attributes. Include appropriate support information for each driver. The completed document should include in-text citation reference list. Use APA format for all citations.
Organization corporate reputation review.
Document Typing Directions Organization Corporate Reputation Review: · Double Space · Size 12 Times New Roman Font · One Inch Margins Right, Left, Top, and Bottom · Use of Appropriate Headings Levels · Cover Page · APA Format (reference citations) · Document Length: 8-10 pages (Not included in page count: cover page, abstract, or reference list) · Part 1 and Part 2 of the review are submitted in the same document at the same time. This is not a two part assignment with two different due dates. https://youtu.be/OlXrHxinMa4
Attached Files
|
Hunting of animals. 2023 Best
This assignment involves writing an argumentative essay on hunting of animals. Paper instructions: Develop a paper that represents your stand on a controversial issue. Please phrase your issue as a question and state your thesis or conclusion clearly in the introduction.
Hunting of animals.
Is hunting ethical. Develop a paper that represents your stand on a controversial issue. Please phrase your issue as a question and state your thesis or conclusion clearly in the introduction. It will be necessary for you to do research for this paper (from books, journals, magazines, newspapers, internet) in order to support your conclusion. You must have at least eight sources. At least two of these sources should be considered a scholarly source (journals published by professional organizations), and the other sources may be taken from books, popular or general interest periodicals (Time, Newsweek, L.A. Times, etc.) or reliable internet sites, not Wikipedia.
Hunting of animals.
You will want to include a variety of types of support (evidence) which might include statistics from current research, possibly case studies, testimonials from experts, analogies, and so on. Remember to address counterarguments. Papers will be evaluated for clearly stated conclusions, sufficient and sound reasoning, solid, appropriate, reliable evidence, appropriate organization, and clarity. The paper should be typed, double spaced, and approximately 8 pages in length. https://youtu.be/C_uC2YfFzps
Attached Files
|
Mentoring Programs. 2023 Best
Paper instructions: Annotated bibliography including 5 articles describing mentoring programs. *Recent journal articles within 10 years. Provide a link to each article under citation** An annotated bibliography is a list of sources (books, journals, Web sites, periodicals, etc.)
Mentoring Programs.
Paper instructions: Annotated bibliography including 5 articles describing mentoring programs. *Recent journal articles within 10 years. Provide a link to each article under citation** An annotated bibliography is a list of sources (books, journals, Web sites, periodicals, etc.) one has used for researching a topic. Bibliographies are sometimes called “References” or “Works Cited” depending on the style format you are using. A bibliography usually just includes the bibliographic information (i.e., the author, title, publisher, etc.). An annotated bibliography contains a summary and/or evaluation.
Mentoring Programs.
Therefore, an annotated bibliography includes a summary and/or evaluation of each of the sources. Annotated bibliography summaries should include two paragraphs following the APA citation: one paragraph summary of the research article and one brief paragraph including both the assessment of the research article and a single reflection statement of its worth. Each annotated bibliography source should follow the APA format and should not exceed notations longer than two paragraphs. (See the additional information provided below.) Summarize: Some annotations merely summarize the source.
Mentoring Programs.
What are the main arguments? What is the point of this book or article? What topics are covered? If someone asked what this article/book is about, what would you say? The length of your annotations will determine how detailed your summary is. Assess/Evaluate: After summarizing a source, it may be helpful to evaluate it. Is it a useful source? How does it compare with other sources in your bibliography? Is the information reliable? Is this source biased or objective? What is the goal of this source? Reflect: Once you’ve summarized and assessed a source, you need to ask how it fits into your research. Was this source helpful to you? Has it changed how you think about your topic?
Mentoring Programs.
This annotated bibliography assignment in IL 690 provides you with an opportunity to read mentoring research for this course more critically. The annotated bibliography provides you with in-depth research on the course topics and assists you in expanding your knowledge of mentoring. Source: OWL Writing Lab, Purdue University: Contributors Dana Bisignani, Allen Brizee; retrieved from the following site: https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/614/01 https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/common_writing_assignments/annotated_bibliographies/annotated_bibliography_samples.htmlLinks to an external site. https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/common_writing_assignments/annotated_bibliographies/index.htmlLinks to an external site.
Mentoring Programs.
The notations in annotated bibliography summaries should include two paragraphs following the APA citation: one paragraph summary of the research article and one brief paragraph including both the assessment of the research article and a single reflection statement of its worth. Each one of the 5 annotated bibliographies should follow the APA format and should not exceed notations longer than the two paragraphs as delineated above. Do NOT copy the abstract of the source. Put all information for the paragraphs in your own words. **Provide a link to each article under citation** https://youtu.be/Uv8a6RiFZ2E
Attached Files
|
Business Technical Writing 2023 Best
This paper explores business technical writing – Diplomacy, Tone, and Emphasis in Technical Writing. Scenario: Your supervisor Tina promised to send you a spreadsheet full of data that is central to a report you’re writing. Specifically, the spreadsheet needs to include sales figures for each week for the months of January, February, and March 2021.
Business Technical Writing
Instructions Minimum 200 words Scenario: Your supervisor Tina promised to send you a spreadsheet full of data that is central to a report you’re writing. Specifically, the spreadsheet needs to include sales figures for each week for the months of January, February, and March 2021. Last time Tina sent the data, it was incomplete only including data from January. She said she’d have it to you by Thursday, and today is Friday. Your own report is due Monday. In your email, be sure to specify and emphasize exactly what you need from Tina.
Business Technical Writing
Be sure to consider power relationships and other factors when constructing the email. Your Task: Write Tina a brief email about this situation. In particular, follow the guidelines for diplomacy, tone, and emphasis in business writing from your textbook (Unit 3.2) You may use your textbook and notes; however, you must complete Part 1 of the exam within 50 minutes. Manage your time wisely. Attach your email in Canvas. Please note these examples are not in email format like this assignment should be done but rather are examples that show you how to talk to your supervisor when dealing with this situation. what is the right and wrong.
Business Technical Writing
Examples of Memos to be understand the email should be read – https://writingcommons.org/article/memos/ Below is another link to help better understand how the assignment should be completed although when you intialIy visit the site the reading will seem very long however you can find help for this assignment in SECTION 3.2. https://www.oercommons.org/authoring/54645-professional-and-technical-writing/3/view. https://youtu.be/wVjhoCc5yBY
Attached Files
|
The effects pets have on humans 2023 Best
This paper explores the effects pets have on humans social, physical, mental health. In the “Introduction” section you are to introduce the topic—specifically the hypothesis: Hypothesis: Discuss a question that can be solved through investigation or review of current literature
The effects pets have on humans
The effects pets have on humans social, physical, mental health. At least 10 references are cited, 3 of which must be from peer-reviewed journals. ● Follows APA style (includes spelling, grammar, bibliography) ● At least 2000 words in length The purpose/necessary learning objective of this assignment: analysis. You will be mastering scientific method in order to analyze a scientific topic. Your task is to choose a scientific topic and analyze the case study with the following necessary components labeled as “sections” in your literature review: 1. In the “Introduction” section you are to introduce the topic—specifically the hypothesis:
The effects pets have on humans
Hypothesis: Discuss a question that can be solved through investigation or review of current literature (This is not your original research.) You must state the question in the form of a hypothesis. You can choose any topic that is in the realm of scientific peer-reviewed literature. Topics can also be from interdisciplinary peer-reviewed sources. ● Objectives: List objectives that you will address within your literature review. This means that you will map out all of the avenues that you will cover within the subsequent sections and list exactly in what sections you will cover them. These objectives are schematically provided for you in what follows.
The effects pets have on humans
However, don’t just state: I will talk about the ‘methods’. State, very compactly, 2.a-e. The difficulty in these types of projects is how to express something precisely. 2. In the “Methods” section you are to describe your search process and the rational/criterion for selection of references for inclusion. This means that you will: ● Information Sources: Describe the processes/search engines that you used to search your topic (e.g., google scholar, open source catalogues, databases etc.). ● Source types: Describe the particular sources that you are searching (e.g. books, journals, secondary literature etc.)
The effects pets have on humans
Revisions: Related to “a” and “b”, describe how you formulated your search (e.g. keywords, filters, etc.); and, more importantly, how you revised your search along the way after encountering potential limitations. ● Criterion: Describe the search criterion you used. ● Method of inclusion/exclusion: Describe how you limited the search as well as how certain sources were included and why others were excluded. Here, it is important to address what articles and authors could have been excluded and why. I encourage you to be as inclusive as possible in your search. Academia itself has many systemic biases that need to be uncovered and changed.
The effects pets have on humans
Certain research projects do not receive funding based on these system biases. Point out these biases and describe how you sought out sources that addressed the biases. Remember, I’m not looking for the right answer on some research project, rather, I’m looking for how you analyze and navigate; and part of that is understanding the inherent biases in certain journals. 3. In the “Results” section you are to synthesize/amalgamate the evidence for the hypothesis by structuring the following: ● Synthesis of information: Synthesize, structure, and analytically summarize the content of reviewed literature.
The effects pets have on humans
That is, how can we combine all of the various analyses from various sources into one cohesive story? You will have to develop the narrative for that story by organizing the various sources of information and then tracing the story through the sources. I’d recommend attempting to find common variables or parameters between your sources. That is, study 1 and study 2 both focus on Alzheimer oligomer formation and produce the same results, even though the methods differ in the following respect. Here, ‘oligomer formation’ is the variable, the similarity of result is the value of the variable, and the different methods are the experimental or lab setups that are behind the results. https://youtu.be/KNM5_lO1dOA
Attached Files
|
American politics today 2023 Best
This paper focuses on the following prompt: What do you think is the most important issue in American politics today? Why is it so important? How does it affect your own life?
American politics today
Paper instructions: Prompt: What do you think is the most important issue in American politics today? Why is it so important? How does it affect your own life? Do This Assignment Details: The first sentence of your essay should answer the prompt and successive sentences should be used to explain your assertion in that initial sentence using relevant, compelling evidence. Your essay’s word count should be within 10% of 650-word limit (i.e. between 585 and 715 words) Include your essay’s word count at the top of the first page of your essay. Use at least two different types of reliable sources (e.g. newspaper articles, academic articles, books, respectable blog postings, etc.) to support your explanation of the topic’s importance.
American politics today
Cite all your sources and provide a reference list using APA or MLA style. You must cite evidence from the textbook and all other supporting evidence you reference in your essay. NOTE: You will not be penalized for poor use of citations of your sources or reference systems at this point in the semester, but future essays will require you to cite properly. Save your essay as a “.doc” or “.docx” file and upload it to the appropriate assignment area. https://youtu.be/CzCp7arUfSo
Attached Files
|
Monsters in literature. 2022 Best
This paper explores monsters in literature. Paper details: monsters in literature Chris Baldick: http://knarf.english.upenn.edu/Articles/baldick3.html Susan Hitchcock: https://wayback.archive-it.org/11788/20200108050451/http://exhibitions.nypl.org/biblion/outsiders/frankenstein/essay/essayhitchcock.
Monsters in literature.
Paper details: monsters in literature Chris Baldick: http://knarf.english.upenn.edu/Articles/baldick3.html Susan Hitchcock: https://wayback.archive-it.org/11788/20200108050451/http://exhibitions.nypl.org/biblion/outsiders/frankenstein/essay/essayhitchcock. Cat Irving: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o7Dvip3yexM please use Frankenstein original movie and Titus Andronicus as primary sources. for the 5 secondary sources please Use Chris Baldrick essay, Susan Hitchcock essay, Elizabeth young essay, Cat Irving Frankenstein and medical science, and Stephen asma monsters and the moral imagination.
Monsters in literature.
A bibliography is a list of sources (books, journals, websites, films, etc.) you have used or you are currently using for researching a topic. You may produce a bibliography at any point in your research. A works cited page, in contrast, can only accompany your actual finished essay or article—the word “cited” implies that you have referred to and cited the source in your own writing. So this assignment is a bibliography, because you have not yet produced your term papers nor incorporated quotes into your own writing. (Your final paper should include a works cited page at the end, but you will have already turned in your bibliography, so you do not need to include it again!)
Monsters in literature.
An annotation is a summary, evaluation of, and/or commentary on a source. Therefore, an annotated bibliography includes a summary and brief evaluation of each of the sources. For this assignment, you will list—in MLA format—at least two primary and five secondary sources that you are using or most likely plan to use for the final paper assignment in this class. Remember, a primary source is the text or object you are directly making a claim about, and a secondary source provides you with some tools (historical or cultural context, theories or philosophies, definitions, expert reviews and commentary, etc) to help you support those claims.
Monsters in literature.
You are not required to use outside sources, but you may if you wish. Remember that secondary sources should be unbiased, present material objectively, and possess credible expertise in relation to the subject (for instance, peer reviewed academic journals or books, or essays or articles by acknowledged experts in the field). Note: you are not tied to these sources; you may change your mind later on when writing the paper! You may also add more sources while writing your final paper; this is only the minimum for this assignment! You should follow each entry with your annotations for that entry.
Monsters in literature.
Annotations should be at least 2-3 sentences per entry and cover the following topics: Summary: If a primary source, what is the main overall plot? If a secondary source, what is the author’s main argument or thesis? What is the overall point of this source? What topics are covered? In other words, if someone asked you what this source is about, what would you say? Evaluation: How is this source useful to you? What does this source contribute to the claims you want to make in this project? If it is a primary source, what might be the most important evidence or details that you could use?
Monsters in literature.
If it is a secondary source, what does it do—for example, does it provide definitions of important concepts, or historical context, or an expert analysis of a text? Which classical rhetorical strategies does the author use to make their point? (Rhetorical strategies include logos (persuasion based on logic), pathos (persuasion based on emotion), and ethos (persuasion based on the use of some form of authority). Finally, has the source changed how you think about your topic? Some Student Examples: Primary Source 1. McKinley, Robin. The Blue Sword. HarperCollins, 1982.
Monsters in literature.
This novel follows the journey of the orphan girl Harry Crewe as she becomes a warrior and ultimately a hero in a foreign country, becoming adopted into that culture and inheriting a magical sword. This source is useful for my project because it provides an example of a traditional hero’s journey, but with a nontraditional young woman hero, someone who goes against stereotypical gender roles and protects not her birth home but her adopted culture, showing a desire for heroes who fight more cultural “monsters,” like the challenges of being an outsider as well as gender inequality. https://youtu.be/_IfFMXoEZ4I
Attached Files
|
Annotated bibliography on Sex Trafficking. 2022 Best
This assignment involves writing an annotated bibliography on Sex Trafficking. An annotation is a summary and/or evaluation. Therefore, an annotated bibliography includes a summary and/or evaluation of each of the sources. Depending on your project or the assignment, your annotations may do one or more of the following.
Annotated bibliography on Sex Trafficking.
Paper details: Assignment Students are to submit an annotated bibliography for 4 peer reviewed journals on the topic they have been assigned If you do not know what a Peer Reviewed Journal Article or how to write an annotated bibliography, then you should meet with a university librarian to obtain guidance for this assignment. A bibliography is a list of sources (books, journals, Web sites, periodicals, etc.) one has used for researching a topic. Bibliographies are sometimes called “References” or “Works Cited” depending on the style format you are using. A bibliography usually just includes the bibliographic information (i.e., the author, title, publisher, etc.).
Annotated bibliography on Sex Trafficking.
An annotation is a summary and/or evaluation. Therefore, an annotated bibliography includes a summary and/or evaluation of each of the sources. Depending on your project or the assignment, your annotations may do one or more of the following. Summarize: Some annotations merely summarize the source. What are the main arguments? What is the point of this book or article? What topics are covered? If someone asked what this article/book is about, what would you say? The length of your annotations will determine how detailed your summary is. Assess: After summarizing a source, it may be helpful to evaluate it.
Annotated bibliography on Sex Trafficking.
Is it a useful source? How does it compare with other sources in your bibliography? Is the information reliable? Is this source biased or objective? What is the goal of this source? Reflect: Once you’ve summarized and assessed a source, you need to ask how it fits into your research. Was this source helpful to you? How does it help you shape your argument? How can you use this source in your research project? Has it changed how you think about your topic? Formatting requirements (NOTE: This is to be done for EACH article – AGAIN- 4 Separate Journal Articles).
Annotated bibliography on Sex Trafficking.
Each Journal bibliography should have the following HEADINGS (Citation, Summarize, Assess, and Reflect) and each section should cover the information under each of the headings below (again, use the heading – do not include the information included with the headings below – the information included with the headings below is what you will be covering in each heading/section). This a Narrative assignment – do not just have bullets that answer all the information that should be covered in each section. Citation: Full article reference citation – APA Style Summarize: What are the main arguments?
Annotated bibliography on Sex Trafficking.
What is the point of this article? What topics are covered? Minimum 2 paragraphs Minimum 6 full sentences per paragraph – Original summary – not pasted-in sections Assess: Is the information reliable? Is this source biased or objective? What is the goal of this source? (in other words, does the study look like it was done well does it present reliable and unbiased findings) Minimum 1 paragraph Minimum 6 full sentences – Original summary – not pasted-in sections.
Annotated bibliography on Sex Trafficking.
Reflect: How does this article apply and/or fit into your Research Project Minimum 2 paragraphs Minimum 6 full sentences per paragraph – Original summary – not pasted-in sections VERY IMPORATANT: You will need to read the whole journal articles to assess their value toward your topic. Reading just the abstract will not be enough (trust me, it will be obvious that it was all you read and your grade will be significantly impacted). https://youtu.be/nh1emIVHy8g
Attached Files
|
Writing a scholarly article review. 2022 Best
This assignment involves writing a scholarly article review. Instructions For this assignment, you will choose a scholarly article pertinent to your research topic and write a review of it.
Writing a scholarly article review.
Scholarly article pertinent to your research topic and write a review of it. Instructions For this assignment, you will choose a scholarly article pertinent to your research topic and write a review of it. You will “de-construct” the article for the reader, analyzing the claims that the author is making and how well he/she supports those claims. You will also explain how this article fits into your research strategy to answer your research question. Does it provide some insights but still leave you wondering? Technical Requirements Your paper must be at a minimum of 2-3 pages (the Title and Reference pages do not count towards the minimum limit).
Writing a scholarly article review.
Scholarly and credible references should be used. A good rule of thumb is at least 2 scholarly sources per page of content. Type in Times New Roman, 12 point and double space. Students will follow the current APA Style as the sole citation and reference style used in written work submitted as part of coursework. Points will be deducted for the use of Wikipedia or encyclopedic type sources. It is highly advised to utilize books, peer-reviewed journals, articles, archived documents, etc. All submissions will be graded using the assignment rubric (see below).
Writing a scholarly article review.
Guidance for Success on the Week 4 Writing Assignment This week you will choose an article pertinent to your research topic and write a critical review of it to determine its credibility. You will not be re-writing it; rather, you will “de-construct” the article for the reader, analyzing the claims that the author makes and how well s/he supports those claims using logic and supporting evidence. You will also explain how this article fits into your research strategy to answer your research question and your thinking on the topic. Be certain to identify explicitly the specific claims the author makes.
Writing a scholarly article review.
Next, assess how well the author makes the claims you have identified. This includes assessing both how the author makes use of facts (i.e., evidence) and reasoning (i.e., logic) to support his/her claims and also a critical assessment of the credibility of the sources the author cites and upon which the author bases his/her claims. Did the author draw his/her evidence from credible sources, and did s/he make good use of the evidence? An author must do both well to be effective, and learning how to determine if an author accomplished these dual objectives is an essential component of becoming an effective researcher and writer!
Writing a scholarly article review.
Once you have addressed the claims and sources used for support, turn your attention to how the article relates to your own work by stating specifically how the article fits into your research strategy. Conclude your review of the article by stating whether the article helped you in developing an answer to your research question (it is okay if it did not), and letting the reader know if you gained any specific insight(s) from it and/or if it left you wondering about other aspects of your topic, or both (as long as you address both of these aspects, you will be okay). Use the components of the grading rubric as your subheadings to ensure that you address each aspect of the assignment.
Writing a scholarly article review.
Week 4 Writing Assignment Grading Rubric Here is the grading rubric I will use to evaluate the Week 4 writing assignment: What claims does the author make? (Identify the author’s claims specifically) (20 pts) How well are the claims supported by both facts (i.e., evidence) from credible sources and reasoning (logic) that makes sense? (Need to address both how the author makes use of facts and reasoning to support his/her claims and also perform a critical assessment of the credibility of the sources used by the author to support his/her claims) (20 pts) How does the article fit into your research strategy? https://youtu.be/EuOhN5HmajM
Attached Files
|
United States counterterrorism efforts. 2022 Best
The effectiveness of United States Counterterrorism efforts…does it work? Paper details: Instructions In this assignment, you will put all the pieces together, requiring that you go back and review several elements
United States counterterrorism efforts.
The effectiveness of U.S. Counterterrorism efforts…does it work? Paper details: Instructions In this assignment, you will put all the pieces together, requiring that you go back and review several elements: Title Page Introduction, research question, hypothesis Research Design Analysis Conclusion References Technical Requirements Your paper must be at a minimum of 5-6 pages (the Title and Reference pages do not count towards the minimum limit). Scholarly and credible references should be used. ]
United States counterterrorism efforts.
A good rule of thumb is at least 2 scholarly sources per page of content. Type in Times New Roman, 12 point and double space. Students will follow the current APA Style as the sole citation and reference style used in written work submitted as part of coursework. Points will be deducted for the use of Wikipedia or encyclopedic type sources. It is highly advised to utilize books, peer-reviewed journals, articles, archived documents, etc. https://youtu.be/7jnemEGSGsU
Attached Files
|
